Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Politics (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=39)
-   -   OJ: did he do it? (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=233515)

Dead 04-16-2005 04:16 AM

OJ: did he do it?
 
I say no. What say you?

bholdr 04-16-2005 04:43 AM

Re: OJ: did he do it?
 
YES.



duh.

zaxx19 04-16-2005 05:27 AM

Re: OJ: did he do it?
 
Of course not...

Black people = GOOD

White people = BAD

Dont you understand the idiot liberal ideology DEAD aheres to??

Remember all things can be broken down into- Good/Bad,

Colonial/Indigenous, Black/White, Liberal/Nazi....

It is really quite simple.

Warchant88 04-16-2005 11:14 AM

Re: OJ: did he do it?
 
This really isn't a political issue, but it ended up becoming that way for the most part.

I think he did it, but I was in elementary school when it happened, so my guess isn't worth much.

player24 04-16-2005 12:18 PM

Re: OJ: did he do it?
 
The evidence against OJ was overwhelming. Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Broken Glass Can 04-16-2005 01:03 PM

Re: OJ: did he do it?
 
Let me say the same thing as I did in the OOT thread on OJ:

A guilty verdict means:
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He did it

A not guilty verdict means:
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He almost certainly did it just short of reasonable doubt -or-
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He probably did it -or-
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He likely did it more often than not -or-
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He might have done it -or-
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He could very well have done it -or-
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He's innocent -or-
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]We the Jury are too lazy to figure it out -or-
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]Jury nullification rules! -or-
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]Damn, I'll be a media star if I let Him off -or-
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]Insert reason here.


His not guilty verdict does not mean he is truly innocent. There are a lot more reasons to get to not guilty than to get to guilty, and most of them still lead you to the likelihood that OJ did it.

bholdr 04-16-2005 02:00 PM

Re: OJ: did he do it?
 
[ QUOTE ]
Black people = GOOD

White people = BAD

Dont you understand the idiot liberal ideology DEAD aheres to??


[/ QUOTE ]


wtf does this have to do with anything?

jesusarenque 04-16-2005 03:05 PM

Re: OJ: did he do it?
 
[ QUOTE ]
Let me say the same thing as I did in the OOT thread on OJ:

A guilty verdict means:
[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]He did it


[/ QUOTE ]

Not necessarily

BCPVP 04-16-2005 05:35 PM

Re: OJ: did he do it?
 
I say how can you think he didn't?
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/proj.../Jurypage.html

Dead 04-16-2005 05:37 PM

Re: OJ: did he do it?
 
Prosecution's fault. Most whites assumed he was guilty because he was black.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.