My take on FTR
 

I was a debater in both high school and college. On my high school squad, there was a wierd hierarchy. At the top were the best our squad had to offer. These people not only were the most successfull, but also the most productive, and, to some degree, the most arrogant. Never to the point of belittling those whose lives werent consumed by debate, but there was some definite joshing occuring, which was only reasonable since the people on the recieving end werent as committed to the event as those dishing out. However, the ranks of the "elite" were always open. I remember when i was accepted as one of our top debaters, and i remember when we accepted others. Sure, some people occasionally got their feelings hurt, but in the end, we would always come together, and remember that we were a team, helping each other out. This is twoplustwo. Sure, we point out when someone is stupid, and we try to belittle those who are repeatedly stupid. We like make fun of each other, and we enjoy jokes at ours' and others' expense. But we are also always here to help each other. We also, rightly in my view, are proud of the skills we have obtained, and are refining, in our craft, and happy with our "teams" success. We are always there for each other, even if it is only half the forum uniting against the other half about who the hottest chick under thirteen is. In the end though, we are a group of people almost universally rabid about improving our poker game, and willing to engage in fierce discussion to come to the proper conclusion.

FTR seems much more social, much less combatitive. I have never felt stressed here, but FTR seems even more relaxed. I for one dont like the fact that posts are getting discussed days later without the "correct" answer ever being labeled as such. This isnt neccesarily a bad thing, but i think the vast magority of FTRs membership is hiding behind a veil of weak-tight-dom, or at the very least are unwilling to properly engage in criticism of their play. I think that there are probably quite a few at-least-break-even players in that forum, with a handfull of really good players, but i think someone would be better served in our forum, especially since the "thick-skin" one develops here is usefull in the game of poker which can be a cold, mathematically frustrating b[/i]itch sometimes. But, they are doing there thing, and its really not funny, like the qlc was, so much as its just sort of meh. Free country, let em do what they want. However, i am willing to put all the money in my stars account on daryn.

Oh, and everyone should try to guess my FTR screenname. Its should be insanely easy.

peace

john nickle

Re: My take on FTR
 

Well put, John. I think we are being overly harsh on these people. However, I still wanna see some match ups. We should definitely organize some sort of competition.

Re: My take on FTR
 

I was a debater in both high school and college.

I remember when i was accepted as one of our top debaters,

I too remember the day when i became a master debater.

Re: My take on FTR
 

[ QUOTE ]
I too remember the day when i became a master debater.

[/ QUOTE ]


wow, i havent heard that joke in years. It didnt improve with age.

Cubs, you debate in college?

and someone guess my FTR screenname dammit.

peace

john nickle

Re: My take on FTR
 

Cubs, you debate in college?

i never took a liking to formal debating... it was always too... well... formal for me. plus, i have always been better at putting my thoughts together on paper.

cubs

Re: My take on FTR
 

wtf is ftr

Re: My take on FTR
 

2 questions.

a) WTF is this FTR you speak of?

b) Parli or policy?

Will

Re: My take on FTR
 

[ QUOTE ]
wtf is ftr

[/ QUOTE ]

buster, i,,,,i really dont know what to say to this.....

peace

john nickle

Re: My take on FTR
 

[ QUOTE ]
2 questions.

a) WTF is this FTR you speak of?

b) Parli or policy?

Will

[/ QUOTE ]


a) see above. If you have somehow missed out on the controversey du jour, im not dredging it back up for you. Ok, i will. Check out the "lets do a qlc on their ass"( or whatever) thread down below.

b) policy. Only policy. Parli sounded fun, but so do bubble baths. Doesnt mean i do either without the promise of sexual favors from a hot chick...

peace

john nickle

Re: My take on FTR
 

[ QUOTE ]
Well put, John. I think we are being overly harsh on these people. However, I still wanna see some match ups. We should definitely organize some sort of competition.

[/ QUOTE ]

Greetings from FTR!

All in all I think today got sort of silly. You guys have your thing and we have ours, I think we can agree to disagree about the ways our communities operate.

As far as an organized competition, I think it would be a lot of fun. I had a great time playing with all of you in the tsunami relief tournament.

Here's what I propose:

Each site chooses a set number of players (10? 15?) to participate in a private no limit holdem tournament on PokerStars. The buyin would be small to make sure everyone can participate, let's say $10 or $20. The entire proceeds would be donated to a worthy charity, possibly the same as the tsunami relief tourment was. (GrannyMae, would you like to take care of this part?)

"Winner" would be determined by total prize money accumulated by either site.

Alternately, we could assign a certain number of "points" to the top X places, something along the lines of say 40 for 1st, 25 for 2nd, 15 for 3rd, 8 for 4th, 6 for 5th, etc. We could work out some kind of distribution that works out for everyone.

Maybe we could include some kind of fun side bet, something like changing the losing participants' home page or location field in their forum profiles to the URL of the winning site.

Thoughts, comments, suggestions?