Self Important Psuedo Intellectuals or Unite Lest We Be Banned!
 

This is a call to all those who have been "wronged" on these forums. Join with me in rising up against the oppressive masses who can't see the genius in proclaiming one poker player better than another, in questioning the talent of those we see playing the World's game on the television, or our insight into the way said game is played. And certainly in our abilities to point out the flaws and misconceptions in others' opinions on said subjects.

WE MUST UNITE LEST WE BE BANNED!

There are those deluded individuals who think that the internet, and these forums in particular, should in some way be limited in discussion to that which is relevant. These same misguided proles demand that we be bound by some sort of unilateral moral social contract that has us be (gasp) polite, courteous and cordial.

Cordial!?!?! Do we drink tea with our pinky fingers extended at the proper angle? Do we placate the feminine of our species by standing idle while obstructing the postern in order to allow for unfettered ingress?

No, sirs. We are bound by no such nonsense!

Let us petition then, so that our posterity may be free from these shackles.

Join me. Unite!

GET A LIFE N/M
 

n/m

Re: Self Important Psuedo Intellectuals or Unite Lest We Be Banned!
 

as Gabby Hayes Johnson said in 'Blazing Saddles'........

............RIVVIT!!!!!!!!!!

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Re: Self Important Psuedo Intellectuals or Unite Lest We Be Banned!
 

I wish you success in getting your group together. Once you post your membership list, Mat's job will be a lot easier. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Re: Self Important Psuedo Intellectuals or Unite Lest We Be Banned!
 

Holdem Hi: 1712304 enumerated boards
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Qs 8h 1129009 65.94 567799 33.16 15496 0.90 0.664
3c 7d 567799 33.16 1129009 65.94 15496 0.90 0.336

Sorry, I own you pre-flop.

Re: Self Important Psuedo Intellectuals or Unite Lest We Be Banned!
 

Well, "own" is a very strong statement for a 2 to 1 advantage. Wouldn't it depend on the size of the pot verses how much I would have to call to see the flop as to who owns whom?