Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Poker Theory (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Question for Miller, Sklansky, or Malmouth (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=148494)

BillUCF 11-12-2004 08:16 PM

Question for Miller, Sklansky, or Malmouth
 
In the conclusion of Small Stakes Hold'em you state a successful small stakes player should make $50k at 3/6 online. Is this 4BB/hr for 2000 hours at one table? 2BB/hr for 1000 hours playing 2 simultaneous tables? Or some other combination. Just want to know how you came up with your numbers. Thanks.

Bill McClintic

Iceman 11-12-2004 08:50 PM

Re: Question for Miller, Sklansky, or Malmouth
 
[ QUOTE ]
In the conclusion of Small Stakes Hold'em you state a successful small stakes player should make $50k at 3/6 online. Is this 4BB/hr for 2000 hours at one table? 2BB/hr for 1000 hours playing 2 simultaneous tables? Or some other combination. Just want to know how you came up with your numbers. Thanks.

[/ QUOTE ]

$6 per hour x 4 tables x 2000 hours = $48,000. Nobody averages 4 BB/hr in online 3-6.

Ed Miller 11-12-2004 09:18 PM

Re: Question for Miller, Sklansky, or Malmouth
 
It assumes playing multiple tables... four or more.

Sponger15SB 11-13-2004 03:46 AM

Re: Question for Miller, Sklansky, or Malmouth
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
In the conclusion of Small Stakes Hold'em you state a successful small stakes player should make $50k at 3/6 online. Is this 4BB/hr for 2000 hours at one table? 2BB/hr for 1000 hours playing 2 simultaneous tables? Or some other combination. Just want to know how you came up with your numbers. Thanks.

[/ QUOTE ]

$6 per hour x 4 tables x 2000 hours = $48,000. Nobody averages 4 BB/hr in online 3-6.

[/ QUOTE ]

hey whoa whoa whoa you aren't miller, "sklansky", or "malmouth"....

why did you respond to this thread?

wdbaker 11-14-2004 01:31 AM

Re: Question for Miller, Sklansky, or Malmouth
 
[ QUOTE ]

hey whoa whoa whoa you aren't miller, "sklansky", or "malmouth"....

why did you respond to this thread?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ahhhh same question to you [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

I am officially contesting your post [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Now if someone will contest my post maybe we can get on with our lives [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]

One Street at a Time
wdbaker Denver, Co

timmer 11-14-2004 12:37 PM

Re: Question for Miller, Sklansky, or Malmouth
 
aren't the parameters for this contention covered in the book ?

timmer

BillUCF 11-14-2004 03:38 PM

Re: Question for Miller, Sklansky, or Malmouth
 
You guys are killing me. thanks for the replies.

BillUCF

CrackerZack 11-15-2004 08:50 PM

Re: Question for Miller, Sklansky, or Malmouth
 
People do it in the 15/30 game but not in the 3/6?

I remember someone a while back said the 3/6 was the toughest game around. Even the some pros won't play it, they can't handle the swings. Maybe there is something to it.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.