Interesting Non Poker Thinking Problem
 

Technically this should be posted on the Probability Forum but it would get fewer views there.

Why I found this question interesting was because I realized that the approximately correct answer could be deduced from pure thought. If instead, you used guesswork without thinking, you would more likely be led astray.

If a particular American citizen was selected at random and only his or her age was available to us, there would be an associated probablilty that that particular person would live at least a year. For instance a randomly selected 40 year old might have a 99.7% chance if you know only their age.

How old must the (American) person be such that based on age alone, there is less than an even money chance they will live more than a year from that moment of selection?

PLEASE answer with only a number at first. In a couple of days you can give your reason. I promise to tell you the published factual answer to this question along with the method I used to come close.

Re: Interesting Non Poker Thinking Problem
 

Im pretty sure I'm off, but I'd say 81 years old at 48%

Re: Interesting Non Poker Thinking Problem
 

I have two answers:
1. -8.9 months
2. 100 years

CK

Re: Interesting Non Poker Thinking Problem
 

90

Re: Interesting Non Poker Thinking Problem
 

i say 102...i mean 100, too

Re: Interesting Non Poker Thinking Problem
 

99

Re: Interesting Non Poker Thinking Problem
 

78

Re: Interesting Non Poker Thinking Problem
 

If we're going by simply years 78. If you want to get more accurate I'd say 77.2 years.

Re: Interesting Non Poker Thinking Problem
 

67 1/2

Re: Interesting Non Poker Thinking Problem
 

If I understand the question right, you're asking at what age would people have to be such that greater than 1/2 of those people would be dead within one year . I would think that age would be very high, maybe 105?