Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Texas Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   anti poker tracker (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=365099)

10-25-2005 11:44 AM

anti poker tracker
 
Everybody shares there databases everybody is gonna have millions of hands on everybody. I think the sites should ban all tracking software. Its not real poker in my oppinion when you dont have to pay any attention to the play and just read a number on the screen. As a player that has never used it and taken extensive notes on players and just found out there were such programs I FEEL CHEATED.
rant over

DrSavage 10-25-2005 12:04 PM

Re: anti poker tracker
 
Welcome to 21st century.
Enjoy!

Mempho 10-25-2005 12:14 PM

Re: anti poker tracker
 
[ QUOTE ]
Everybody shares there databases everybody is gonna have millions of hands on everybody. I think the sites should ban all tracking software. Its not real poker in my oppinion when you dont have to pay any attention to the play and just read a number on the screen. As a player that has never used it and taken extensive notes on players and just found out there were such programs I FEEL CHEATED.
rant over

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I can understand how you feel in that sense. I would like to make an important point, however. If the sites were to ban software like pokertracker, it would only cut down on the number of people using the software. In other words, many people would break the Terms & Conditions of the site and find a workaround from the sites' monitoring for such programs. People have already figured out simple ways to do it using a second PC. This would mean that the playing field would be even more unlevel. Right now, anyone who cares enough to improve thier poker game will find out about PokerTracker is short order and go buy it. This puts them on a level playing field. If the site's ban PokerTracker, the playing field will always be unlevel unless that player chooses to break the terms and conditions of the site. That means that honest players lose ground. Is that the way that you would prefer it?

SrGuapo 10-25-2005 12:25 PM

Re: anti poker tracker
 
Well fortunately for you more people abuse and misuse the stats than anyone who truly gets much value out of them. They are highly overrated and oftentimes misunderstood. You aren't missing much, but I think it would be helpful to your development to at least see what's out there, then you'd have a more rationale base for your argument.

10-25-2005 12:48 PM

Re: anti poker tracker
 
This is just stupid. Feel cheated. Whatever.

fish43 10-25-2005 01:12 PM

Re: anti poker tracker
 
They don't need to ban tracking software. They can modify the poker software to make tracking more difficult while still allowing players to track their own data.

List from easy to not so hard.

1. Provide players the option to sit at a table with an anonymous handle .
1a. Provide history data containing the players actual handle.

2. History data doesn't need to contain the name of the other players in the hand.

3. History data should only be accessible to players actually in the hand.

10-25-2005 02:49 PM

Re: anti poker tracker
 
Most people who use PT for opponent info use it so poorly they might as well have no info at all.

Feel glad about that.

mtgordon 10-25-2005 03:49 PM

Re: anti poker tracker
 
Sorry, but I feel this point is awful. I'm not anti-poker tracker, but the argument that you give could also be said about bots and I think almost everyone would agree that they should be banned.

10-25-2005 04:35 PM

Re: anti poker tracker
 
I've been using PT for about 3 months now and here is my opinion on it. Sure, it can help if you don't feel like paying attention too closely if you are multi tabling or talking on the phone or something. But to be honest, many players have very similar standard stats and to get a read on them, you need to pay attention (are they check raising often, do they check the flop, bet the turn with strong hands, etc, the stats don't tell you any of this). What I find it most useful for is after a session, I spend 20 minutes reviewing hands and looking at my stats and trying to see where I could play a hand better.

10-25-2005 04:38 PM

Re: anti poker tracker
 
[ QUOTE ]
Everybody shares there databases everybody is gonna have millions of hands on everybody. I think the sites should ban all tracking software. Its not real poker in my oppinion when you dont have to pay any attention to the play and just read a number on the screen. As a player that has never used it and taken extensive notes on players and just found out there were such programs I FEEL CHEATED.
rant over

[/ QUOTE ]

POTD

Mempho 10-25-2005 05:30 PM

Re: anti poker tracker
 
[ QUOTE ]
Sorry, but I feel this point is awful. I'm not anti-poker tracker, but the argument that you give could also be said about bots and I think almost everyone would agree that they should be banned.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good point, but it is much easier to police for bots. Therefore, they can probably catch most bots while they could never catch someone using PokerTracker on a second PC.

fyodor 10-25-2005 07:07 PM

Re: anti poker tracker
 
I recently purchased 'Anti-Pokertracker' and it seems to be working fine for me. Everytime I go all-in with AA some clown from 2+2 calls thinking I am uberloose. He doesn't know it's Anti-Pokertracker messing with his numbers. In reality AA is the only hand I play.

The $9.99 I spent on it is the best investment I ever made. If you don't have Anti-Pokertracker you might as well just write your opponent a check.

Equal 10-25-2005 08:29 PM

Re: anti poker tracker
 
[ QUOTE ]
I recently purchased 'Anti-Pokertracker' and it seems to be working fine for me. Everytime I go all-in with AA some clown from 2+2 calls thinking I am uberloose. He doesn't know it's Anti-Pokertracker messing with his numbers. In reality AA is the only hand I play.

The $9.99 I spent on it is the best investment I ever made. If you don't have Anti-Pokertracker you might as well just write your opponent a check.

[/ QUOTE ]

SHUSH.

ZenMusician 10-25-2005 08:46 PM

Re: anti poker tracker
 
I'll wager that my PokerBot combined with
Pattern Mapper 2006™ can crush any of
your poker tracking software. And...I'm ratting
you all out to Party for cheating. Yeah.

-ZEN

ZenMusician 10-25-2005 08:48 PM

Re: anti poker tracker
 
There is no way they could detect PokerTracker on your 1st PC
nevermind a second one...such smart kids here too...

-ZEN

SoftcoreRevolt 10-25-2005 09:20 PM

Re: anti poker tracker
 
An amazing posting career.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/do...;Limit=25&

Hey guys, is it moral to share poker information on an internet forum, not everyone has this information!

shant 10-26-2005 03:48 AM

Re: anti poker tracker
 
Take this extensive note: Kill yourself.

10-26-2005 09:11 AM

Re: anti poker tracker
 
No.

charlie_t_jr 10-26-2005 11:35 AM

Re: anti poker tracker
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Everybody shares there databases everybody is gonna have millions of hands on everybody. I think the sites should ban all tracking software. Its not real poker in my oppinion when you dont have to pay any attention to the play and just read a number on the screen. As a player that has never used it and taken extensive notes on players and just found out there were such programs I FEEL CHEATED.
rant over

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I can understand how you feel in that sense. I would like to make an important point, however. If the sites were to ban software like pokertracker, it would only cut down on the number of people using the software. In other words, many people would break the Terms & Conditions of the site and find a workaround from the sites' monitoring for such programs. People have already figured out simple ways to do it using a second PC. This would mean that the playing field would be even more unlevel. Right now, anyone who cares enough to improve thier poker game will find out about PokerTracker is short order and go buy it. This puts them on a level playing field. If the site's ban PokerTracker, the playing field will always be unlevel unless that player chooses to break the terms and conditions of the site. That means that honest players lose ground. Is that the way that you would prefer it?

[/ QUOTE ]

This crap about PT and leveling the playing field is well...crap. If you are a good observant player, playing one or two tables, the guy with PT doesn't have an "advantage" over YOU. Or if he does, it's not because of PT. Oh sure, the PT guy might know that the fellow in seat 4 c/r bluffs on the turn .0003% over the course of 129 hands...but so the frick what.

I mean if you are playing one table and extensively taking notes on your opponents, do you have an UNFAIR advantage?

What PT does besides anylyzing your own play, record keeping, etc. is allow you to multi-table without losing your reads. If thats not REAL poker to you, well so what. But it is NOT an unfair advantage.

Datamining...eh, thats debatable.

obsidian 10-26-2005 12:09 PM

Re: anti poker tracker
 
Your argument seems to be against sharing databases/hand histories, not PT. Surely you don't believe that people don't have the right to know the information of opponents from hands they themselves have played in? Either way, it should be up to the site. If you feel cheated by it that is your problem. You are just as capable to find out about it as everyone else. I can't wait until you learn what rakeback is.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.