Re: Blind Battles: Hand #1
 

If you are going to continue with this hand it must be passively in my opinion. He will NEVER fold a hand that you want him to fold. If a six outer will keep betting it is your responsibility to let him do so in my opinion.

Cartman

Re: Blind Battles: Hand #1
 

apparently I take the more aggressive approach in both of your hands Tstone. While my line plays back at your opponent and lets u fold "cheaper" it also has the sideeffect of stoppng bluffs and sometimes getting u to fold the best hand. But I really hate the c/c line. I use it, I just always dislike using it. Because u flop a pair, it goes c/c, c/c, villian checks behind (power of position baby, sometimes u miss bets without it). Where u CR, bet turn, bet river u get more, but also can be putting in more behind.

Let me know what your thoughts are.

Forgot to mention, as it was played, Id probably just call down.

Re: Blind Battles: Hand #1
 

Those of you who are suggesting a calldown after the turn card, what range are you putting villain on?

Because calling the turn seems to me the worst of the three options.

Re: Blind Battles: Hand #1
 

hi oreo. this is why i have been playing less and less hands out of position against good opponents. i think their positional advantage is worth more than the .5SB i have invested in ALOT of cases. just as you mentioned, in this hand i lose more bets when behind then i gain when ahead. thats a huge disadvantage.

Re: Blind Battles: Hand #1
 

[ QUOTE ]
Those of you who are suggesting a calldown after the turn card, what range are you putting villain on?

Because calling the turn seems to me the worst of the three options.

[/ QUOTE ]

An extremely wide range of openraising hands and a psychological inability to give up when Tstone peels.

scrub