Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=37)
-   -   This is why I'm still at NL50... (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=388914)

GrunchCan 12-01-2005 02:23 AM

This is why I\'m still at NL50...
 
Because I suck!

I'm fairly sure I misplayed every possible action here.

Some history. I'm new to the table. I know that UTG+1 is veeeery loose and veeeery passive, and CO likes to play tricky. He's not nearly as loose as UTG+1, but he's still not atypical for a NL50 player.

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (9 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

MP1 ($16.50)
MP2 ($24.05)
Hero ($46.95)
CO ($18.70)
Button ($22.75)
SB ($5.70)
BB ($50)
UTG ($14.50)
UTG+1 ($14.45)

Preflop: Hero is MP3 with J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls $0.50, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP2 calls $0.50, Hero calls $0.50, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises to $2</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, SB calls $1.75, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls $1.50, MP2 folds, Hero calls $1.50.

Flop: ($9) K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 bets $0.5</font>, Hero calls $0.50, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises to $3</font>, SB folds, UTG+1 calls $2.50, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $44.95...</font>

So if I misplayed every street, it's becasue I didn't know what to do. What should I have done?

PoBoy321 12-01-2005 02:25 AM

Re: This is why I\'m still at NL50...
 
I think it looks fine. You've got a ton of outs against a lot of hands. I probably raise the flop the first time around though.

12-01-2005 02:28 AM

Re: This is why I\'m still at NL50...
 
the board looks like you won, unless he had ak of hearts.

GrunchCan 12-01-2005 02:32 AM

Re: This is why I\'m still at NL50...
 
[ QUOTE ]
I think it looks fine. You've got a ton of outs against a lot of hands. I probably raise the flop the first time around though.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, when the action was on me, I figured if I just called then CO would raise close to 100% of the time becasue of the weakness of UTG's bet. Based on UTG's bet I figured that he would fold to the raise b/c he was probing. I'd then push.

If I made a normal raise of UTG+1's weak bet, CO would again raise many hands. I didn't want that to happen, becasue then I'd probably have to fold. I figured my best plan was let CO 2-bet, UTG+1 to fold, then me push. UTG+1 didn't get that memo, but I stuck to the plan, figuring he was giving an overlay.

zaxx19 12-01-2005 02:33 AM

Re: This is why I\'m still at NL50...
 
Your fine here.

GrunchCan 12-01-2005 02:34 AM

Re: This is why I\'m still at NL50...
 
Results are irrelevant. I edited my post.

CobraGoat 12-01-2005 02:35 AM

Re: This is why I\'m still at NL50...
 
Like Po said except i would not have called this in your position and i would not have called the raise OOP. but then again im a rock.

i think raise your hand on the flop to see where you are but i guess it depends on how you want to play it. if you have a plan to go all in here you might want to play it like you did to get as much money in the pot as possible. i dont know. i dont think this is bad at all, especially since you caught an out [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

12-01-2005 02:40 AM

Re: This is why I\'m still at NL50...
 
I really don't see how you severely misplayed this hand.

Reef 12-01-2005 02:43 AM

Re: This is why I\'m still at NL50...
 
pf is 'ok'. I might just raise utg on the flop to 8 b/c his bet is ridiculously small. He has a weak hand. If CO just raises, go with it. If he just calls, you can still fire out on the turn.

instead of raising it to $45, how about making it 12 or somewhere around there.

GrunchCan 12-01-2005 02:46 AM

Re: This is why I\'m still at NL50...
 
[ QUOTE ]
instead of raising it to $45, how about making it 12 or somewhere around there.

[/ QUOTE ]

I had both opponents covered; I was putting them all-in. I believe effective stacks were about 12.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.