Re: 10/20 Commerce Aces
 

originally read post as k737, not k37k, yes turn bet doesn't make much sense.

Re: 10/20 Commerce Aces
 

i dont mind your play so far... i would raise all in on river most likely.

Re: 10/20 Commerce Aces
 

[ QUOTE ]
i dont mind your play so far... i would raise all in on river most likely.

[/ QUOTE ]

the [censored]? what hand is calling a raise that aces beat?

i'd call and assume you are good here >25% of the time

Re: 10/20 Commerce Aces
 

99-QQ, which is most likely what he has.

Re: 10/20 Commerce Aces
 

[ QUOTE ]
99-QQ, which is most likely what he has.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't see 99-QQ calling here enough to make it profitable

Results
 

I was 50/50 on calling the river bet but decided to call getting 3.2 to 1
He flipped over KK

Not trying to be results oriented I feel the hand went "as good as it could" but my play could be seen as passive.

My thoughts were any raise or bet would ensure a huge pot(high percentage chance of taking the worst of it) or scarring off a pocket pair)

I dunno know-I think given no read/experience with villian a river fold could be found. (what hand range could villian put me on to bet the river giving me over 3 to 1 if villian has qq or jj) But of course, this is commerce

thanks for the replies, off to vegas for New Years and should have some Bellagio 10/20 hands to post next week