Assume donk ass undercard peeler..
 

.. Until proven otherwise?

Party Poker 3/6 Hold'em (6 max, 4 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is SB with Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
UTG calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, BB calls, UTG calls.

Flop: (6 SB) 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, BB folds, UTG calls.

Turn: (4 BB) 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>

Re: Assume donk ass undercard peeler..
 

Looks good to me. Obviously a turn raise would be proof enough. I'd c-f the river UI if I don't have any other read.

Side question. I'm surprised with the 3/6 blind structure to see us raise QJ from the sb with a limper already. I play 1/2 where this seems a more likely play to me. Is this a standard preflop play for you against unknowns?

Re: Assume donk ass undercard peeler..
 

I usually want a read that the BB is tight to raise here, I think I should've just completed against unknowns. I just moved to 3/6 from 2/4 so that could be it, although I'm not sure if it's even standard to raise here in a 1/2 SB structure against unknowns, especially if we think they're going to be peeling Axx flops with undercards. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

Re: Assume donk ass undercard peeler..
 

I just complete preflop.

I check-fold the turn. I don't like firing 2 bullets OOP on an Ace-hi board without reads.