Vertical vs. Horizontal scaling (move up or widen out?)
I have a couple thousand hands under my belt at .05/.10 and am bankrolled for .10/.20, so I was thinking of moving up.
However, I am currently playing on one table at at time. Multitabling seems to be a given for serious online players. Which is a better path of advancement, moving up a limit or adding another table? Why? |
Re: Vertical vs. Horizontal scaling (move up or widen out?)
I'd continue up in limit.
If you're going to multi-table, then make it worth the extra effort. The only other thing I'd say is wait until you are regularly crushing the tables at a particular limit until you start multi-tabling. |
Re: Vertical vs. Horizontal scaling (move up or widen out?)
wait until you are regularly crushing the tables at a particular limit until you start multi-tabling.
A+ answer. The crux is decision making; more experience gives more exposure to situational play. Multi-tabling cuts down on manual reads and can lead to betting action mistakes, etc. Don't worry about being a "serious online player". Play the level that feels right to you and take shots at higher limits to test yourself and get a feel for different styles of play before committing your roll. Once it becomes almost "boring"...this is the time to add a table (1 at a time seems right). Good Luck and post hands at your new level. -ZEN |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.