Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes Shorthanded (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   river raise? (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=407356)

joker122 12-29-2005 09:12 PM

Re: river raise?
 
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, I cap it up too. Like others said, it's going to be AQ/88 here much more often. This guy looks like he may be a LAG too so it may even be something worse

[/ QUOTE ]

CAP?!?!

LoaferGee12 12-29-2005 09:20 PM

Re: river raise?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, I cap it up too. Like others said, it's going to be AQ/88 here much more often. This guy looks like he may be a LAG too so it may even be something worse

[/ QUOTE ]

CAP?!?!

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, in retrospect I think that is a bit much.

krishanleong 12-29-2005 11:21 PM

Re: river raise?
 
posting blind.

3 combo of aces, 6 combos of aq. Laggy player. 4 handed. I raise.

Krishan

milesdyson 12-30-2005 04:17 AM

Re: river raise?
 
[ QUOTE ]
3 combo of aces, 6 combos of aq.

[/ QUOTE ]
3 of AQ

joker122 12-30-2005 07:05 PM

result
 
i pussed out and just called. i think this is def. a raise/call.

he had 88.

TomBrooks 12-30-2005 07:20 PM

Re: result
 
[ QUOTE ]
i pussed out and just called. i think this is def. a raise/call.

he had 88.

[/ QUOTE ]Thats what I was going to say even before I read the results.

mongoose51 12-30-2005 07:33 PM

Re: river raise?
 
I like the river raise, there are a lot of hands he could have that he would play the same way e.g. AQ , 88. If he 3 bets the river, I would just call .

kidcolin 12-30-2005 07:37 PM

Re: river raise?
 
[ QUOTE ]
Do you expect a 22pfr to 3-bet an UTG raise with A8s here? Do you expect AK to cap the turn? These both seem close to me, but I'm not sure they do.

[/ QUOTE ]

Redd, don't take this the wrong way, but a consistent theme in your posts is that you err towards the weak side. You're looking at the stats too much. This is a 4-handed situation, against a 55/22. Not a 28/22. His PFR range is likely much more inconsistent than the typical TAG. A8 and A7 need to be considered, as does 77, an AJ on occassion, or even something zany like KcJc.

I can assure you that this raise is not just slightly +EV or EV neutral.

joker122 12-30-2005 09:36 PM

Re: result
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i pussed out and just called. i think this is def. a raise/call.

he had 88.

[/ QUOTE ]Thats what I was going to say even before I read the results.

[/ QUOTE ]

how is 88 more likely than AA?

12-30-2005 09:56 PM

Re: result
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i pussed out and just called. i think this is def. a raise/call.

he had 88.

[/ QUOTE ]Thats what I was going to say even before I read the results.

[/ QUOTE ]

how is 88 more likely than AA?

[/ QUOTE ]It's obviously not. I say raise and call a 3-bet. This guy most likely would slow down with his 2pairs and maybe even 88 after you show aggression for that long.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.