AA vs bet followed by all-in on flop
 

0.25/0.50 NL 9 players:
Two players in mid-position limp in. Hero is one off the button with As Ah. Raise to 2.50. Both blinds fold, both limpers call.
flop: 2c 3c 5s
villian 1 bets $8
villian two calls and raises $23.48 all-in
What to do?

Re: AA vs bet followed by all-in on flop
 

I think either a call or a fold are justified here. his likely holdings PF are a small PP from 2,2-10,10 a suited Ax or a SC due to the limp-call (definately wanted to see a flop) this flop fits a lot of these hands and there is a good chance your beat. It solely depends on how he has been playin and how he see's you to have been playing. This could so easily be a bluff at what he thinks is your continuation bet but there is absoluely no way of knowing. If he is a standard player i fold, if he has a tendency to be aggressive or come over the top then im calling. this is about as read dependent as it gets

Re: AA vs bet followed by all-in on flop
 

Give us stack sizes and reads and we'll give you some real replies.

Re: AA vs bet followed by all-in on flop
 

really need reads here

Re: AA vs bet followed by all-in on flop
 

both players are weak.
I have a stack size of about 100 and both players have about 25.
Anyway I call and raise all in (the other guy would be all-in if he called the first all-in bet), and the $8 better calls.
Both players turn over A 4 for the flopped wheel.

Re: AA vs bet followed by all-in on flop
 

Wheel and/or set, either way you're beat so often it's not worth calling IMO.

M

Re: AA vs bet followed by all-in on flop
 

[ QUOTE ]
both players are weak.
I have a stack size of about 100 and both players have about 25.
Anyway I call and raise all in (the other guy would be all-in if he called the first all-in bet), and the $8 better calls.
Both players turn over A 4 for the flopped wheel.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, if by "weak" you really mean passive, then this is a fold.