Best Athletes
 

What sport has the best athletes?

By athletes I mean have the fittest, strongest, fastest players. What league or sport posses the best physical specimens?

I personally think it is the NBA, with virtually all their athletes being tall, strong, and fast this game also requires great endurance as the players are running up and down a court for a half hour or more.

Discuss!

Re: Best Athletes
 

NFL, hands down.

Re: Best Athletes
 

I counter with Oliver Miller. I'd say of the major four, it would definitely have to be the NHL, since a fat guy can play the other 3.

Re: Best Athletes
 

[ QUOTE ]
NFL, hands down.

[/ QUOTE ]

I disagree. Half the NFL is obese, what with their over 300 pound linemen.

I'd have to say basketball has the fittest players.

Re: Best Athletes
 

[ QUOTE ]
What sport has the best athletes?

By athletes I mean have the fittest, strongest, fastest players. What league or sport posses the best physical specimens?

I personally think it is the NBA, with virtually all their athletes being tall, strong, and fast this game also requires great endurance as the players are running up and down a court for a half hour or more.

Discuss!

[/ QUOTE ]

overall, NBA or NHL.

Re: Best Athletes
 

I'd say NBA overall

Re: Best Athletes
 

Boxing.

Been discussed before.

Re: Best Athletes
 

He said best, not stupidest.

I was going to say the senior golfers, but then I got a look at the new, even more expansive Walrus on Sunday. Yikes. But then again I guess not everybody can be as buff as Allen Doyle.

Re: Best Athletes
 

gymnastics

Re: Best Athletes
 

[ QUOTE ]
I counter with Oliver Miller. I'd say of the major four, it would definitely have to be the NHL, since a fat guy can play the other 3.

[/ QUOTE ]

i would say there isn't a major four.

Re: Best Athletes
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I counter with Oliver Miller. I'd say of the major four, it would definitely have to be the NHL, since a fat guy can play the other 3.

[/ QUOTE ]

i would say there isn't a major four.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sure. NFL, MLB, NBA, NASCAR.

Re: Best Athletes
 

[ QUOTE ]
Sure. NFL, MLB, NBA, NASCAR.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nascar ahhhhh! I'd rather watch Arena Football or the Oxygen Network.

Re: Best Athletes
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Sure. NFL, MLB, NBA, NASCAR.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nascar ahhhhh! I'd rather watch Arena Football or the Oxygen Network.

[/ QUOTE ]

You might, but the numbers don't lie. They have far and away surpassed the NHL in popularity, both measured with attendance and with TV ratings.

Re: Best Athletes
 

for anyone who has seen any rugby for even a little bit would say that that would be the obvious answer. You are running a very good amount, and hitting too. Its not as anarobic as the NFL because the play is almost always moving. You will never find any out of shape professional rugby players

Re: Best Athletes
 

[ QUOTE ]
for anyone who has seen any rugby for even a little bit would say that that would be the obvious answer. You are running a very good amount, and hitting too. Its not as anarobic as the NFL because the play is almost always moving. You will never find any out of shape professional rugby players

[/ QUOTE ]

I played rugby in highschool and watch it all the time on FSN World Sports Channel. The forwards are larger and they are not in better shape than NBA players.

Re: Best Athletes
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I counter with Oliver Miller. I'd say of the major four, it would definitely have to be the NHL, since a fat guy can play the other 3.

[/ QUOTE ]

i would say there isn't a major four.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sure. NFL, MLB, NBA, NASCAR.

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought this was about sports?

Re: Best Athletes
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
NFL, hands down.

[/ QUOTE ]

I disagree. Half the NFL is obese, what with their over 300 pound linemen.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm always amazed at how athletic those fat men are though. They keep getting both bigger and faster. Freaks.

Re: Best Athletes
 

What about those World's Strongest Man competitors? Those guys are pretty amazing. I'm not saying they'd be out running marathons, but their functional strength and muscular endurance is incredible.

Re: Best Athletes
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
NFL, hands down.

[/ QUOTE ]

I disagree. Half the NFL is obese, what with their over 300 pound linemen.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm always amazed at how athletic those fat men are though. They keep getting both bigger and faster. Freaks.

[/ QUOTE ]

They're not really that fast at all. Their 40 times are unimpressive and they're setting themselves up for heart attacks. Just because they play pro football doesn't mean that they are any healthier than 6'3" 350 pound non-football players.

Re: Best Athletes
 

[ QUOTE ]
They're not really that fast at all. Their 40 times are unimpressive and they're setting themselves up for heart attacks. Just because they play pro football doesn't mean that they are any healthier than 6'3" 350 pound non-football players.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're right. Their 40 times are not impressive, especially compared with much smaller guys. I guess I wasn't really talking about "fast". I was talking about quickness of the line. I won't make an argument that they're the best athletes. And I'm not saying they won't die of heart attacks. But they do keep getting both bigger and quicker, and they're amazingly athletic for their size.

But are we talking about healthy or athletic? They're not the same thing. Is the fact that they may die of a heart attack even relevant to this thread? I'll bet Shaq won't be able to walk five years after he retires from the pounding his knees have taken. The same is true for most NFLers and many gymnasts. Is that relevant to this?

Re: Best Athletes
 

Pornstars.

Re: Best Athletes
 

It is relevant. They don't need to be that fat to do the job. In Lombardi's coaching days, a linebacker was about 210 pounds. The average one is like 260 now. In Lombardi's days a lineman was 250 pounds. Now some of them top 350. They just don't need to be that fat.

And Shaq is quite different because while Shaq is over 300, he is also more than 8 inches taller than even the tallest linemen.

7'1" 325 is nowhere near as fat as 6'3" 325.

Re: Best Athletes
 

I think the answer is fairly obvious. Rugby has by far the best overall athletes. Players have to be multi skilled... backs needs the ability to run, pass, kick, tackle. Forwards need lineout abilities, ruck and maul abilities, scrum abilities etc. Also the game doesn't stop after every play like a certain american sport. I agree backetball also has great athletes, but I think the physical aspect of rugby puts it ahead. I would say boxing is 2nd. In terms of the leage with the best athletes I would say the Tri Nations Rugby (played between New Zealand, Australia and South Africa), as well as the Super 12.

Re: Best Athletes
 

[ QUOTE ]
It is relevant. They don't need to be that fat to do the job. In Lombardi's coaching days, a linebacker was about 210 pounds. The average one is like 260 now. In Lombardi's days a lineman was 250 pounds. Now some of them top 350. They just don't need to be that fat.

And Shaq is quite different because while Shaq is over 300, he is also more than 8 inches taller than even the tallest linemen.

7'1" 325 is nowhere near as fat as 6'3" 325.

[/ QUOTE ]

I wasn't comparing Shaq to the lineman. I was offering another example of someone who's doing harm to his body. I'm not arguing with you on that. I'm asking the question. Is the harm being done that will show up in the future relevant to this question?

Also, I'm not arguing that NFL linemen aren't overweight. Many are. But this doesn't mean they aren't amazing athletes too. Also, if you think that weight is not a factor in doing their job, you're just wrong. Do you honestly believe that Lombardi's team would have any shot at all against one of today's teams? They're bigger, stronger, and faster. People are getting bigger.

Re: Best Athletes
 

[ QUOTE ]
I think the answer is fairly obvious. Rugby has by far the best overall athletes. Players have to be multi skilled... backs needs the ability to run, pass, kick, tackle. Forwards need lineout abilities, ruck and maul abilities, scrum abilities etc. Also the game doesn't stop after every play like a certain american sport. I agree backetball also has great athletes, but I think the physical aspect of rugby puts it ahead.

[/ QUOTE ]

While the -average- international Test-class rugby player I think is certainly a better overall athlete than, say, a 335-pound NFL offensive lineman, the BEST athletes in the NFL are much better than the best athletes in rugby. See, rugby's supporters (of which I am one, I have played and loved the sport for years and wish it had a bigger profile in the USA) tend to deride NFL players for the protective equipment they wear during a game, and call rugby more of a "man's" sport because they don't wear protective equipment. Here's why that argument doesn't quite hold water. I have been in the same room with Test-class rugby players, and I have been in the same room with NFL players. NFL players are WAY bigger and stronger, and the good ones, like, say, Lawrence Taylor or Ray Lewis, are WAY faster. Yeah, if a rugby player takes a hit from another rugby player, it's gonna hurt but he's not probably going to need pads. If a typical rugby player got blindsided by someone with the speed and strength of LT, they'd need a spatula to scoop his remains off of the pitch. The only rugby player that I think has that sort of athletic ability, at least the only one who comes right to mind, is Jonah Lomu. NFL players wear pads because they NEED to wear them to avoid serious, serious injury.

Now if you want to make the argument that rugby players, due to the fact that play never technically "stops" (which isn't exactly true.....don't tell me that rugby doesn't offer plenty of rest opportunities during, say, the interval after a long kick for touch or the 213 minutes it generally takes to set up your typical penalty kick for goal), have more CARDIOVASCULAR FITNESS than your typical NFL player, then I might buy it. But that's a different animal from possessing more ATHLETIC ABILITY.

Re: Best Athletes
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think the answer is fairly obvious. Rugby has by far the best overall athletes. Players have to be multi skilled... backs needs the ability to run, pass, kick, tackle. Forwards need lineout abilities, ruck and maul abilities, scrum abilities etc. Also the game doesn't stop after every play like a certain american sport. I agree backetball also has great athletes, but I think the physical aspect of rugby puts it ahead.

[/ QUOTE ]

While the -average- international Test-class rugby player I think is certainly a better overall athlete than, say, a 335-pound NFL offensive lineman, the BEST athletes in the NFL are much better than the best athletes in rugby. See, rugby's supporters (of which I am one, I have played and loved the sport for years and wish it had a bigger profile in the USA) tend to deride NFL players for the protective equipment they wear during a game, and call rugby more of a "man's" sport because they don't wear protective equipment. Here's why that argument doesn't quite hold water. I have been in the same room with Test-class rugby players, and I have been in the same room with NFL players. NFL players are WAY bigger and stronger, and the good ones, like, say, Lawrence Taylor or Ray Lewis, are WAY faster. Yeah, if a rugby player takes a hit from another rugby player, it's gonna hurt but he's not probably going to need pads. If a typical rugby player got blindsided by someone with the speed and strength of LT, they'd need a spatula to scoop his remains off of the pitch. The only rugby player that I think has that sort of athletic ability, at least the only one who comes right to mind, is Jonah Lomu. NFL players wear pads because they NEED to wear them to avoid serious, serious injury.

Now if you want to make the argument that rugby players, due to the fact that play never technically "stops" (which isn't exactly true.....don't tell me that rugby doesn't offer plenty of rest opportunities during, say, the interval after a long kick for touch or the 213 minutes it generally takes to set up your typical penalty kick for goal), have more CARDIOVASCULAR FITNESS than your typical NFL player, then I might buy it. But that's a different animal from possessing more ATHLETIC ABILITY.

[/ QUOTE ]

Theres a pretty obvious reason why NFL players are physically bigger than rugby players. The speed and continuity of rugby is far greater than NFL. The fact that it takes 3 hours to finish a 60 minute game proves my point. The fact that an offencive and defencive team in nfl is only on the field for roughly 30 minutes of that 60 minutes further proves my point. Sure there are stops in rugby, However a player typically is on the field for the full duration of the game (80 minutes)and a game is over in around 100 minutes (including 10 minutes half time break). I don't think of most nfl players as great athletes and don't think most would make it in international rugby. There are some good athletes in the NFL, Terrel Ownens and Randy Moss would probally make good wingers, guys like Ray lewis probally would be good number 8's/ blind sides, and guys like Vick probally not bad 1st 5/8's I think the overall athleticisim of players like Richie Mcaw, Tana Umunga, George Smith, Joe Rockooko, Brian O'drisciall, Dan Carter exceeds the NFL players.

Re: Best Athletes
 

Well since you're not trying to take into account coordination, balance, dexterity or things of this nature, it seems that track and field is the sport which measures all of the attributes you describe. And since I think you meant which major team sport has the best athletes, that would have to be the NFL. It is very common for football players to be crossover track stars even at high levels of collegiate and even international competition. Find me one rugby player who is a world class sprinter, or high jumper, or shot putter. You'll find the NFL stock full of them.

Re: Best Athletes
 

[ QUOTE ]
Do you honestly believe that Lombardi's team would have any shot at all against one of today's teams?

[/ QUOTE ]

I never said that they'd have a chance against today's teams. But I don't see why the teams of today can't have their linemen go back to a healthy weight.

[ QUOTE ]
Is the harm being done that will show up in the future relevant to this question?


[/ QUOTE ]

No it's not. But the question was who are the best athletes, and it's clearly not NFL players, because most of them are obese and cannot run fast.

Re: Best Athletes
 

[ QUOTE ]
Well since you're not trying to take into account coordination, balance, dexterity or things of this nature, it seems that track and field is the sport which measures all of the attributes you describe. And since I think you meant which major team sport has the best athletes, that would have to be the NFL. It is very common for football players to be crossover track stars even at high levels of collegiate and even international competition. Find me one rugby player who is a world class sprinter, or high jumper, or shot putter. You'll find the NFL stock full of them.

[/ QUOTE ]


sprinting is anarobic, the NFL is anarobic. Do you see how those and other track events that work with the NFL don't really work in rugby? I can garuntee you that Sivivatuu is just as good of a sprinter as any NFL player, and if you ever see Tonderai Chavanaga then you'd know that you haven't seen a faster sprinter in the NFL. THere are way more fat overweight players in the NFL then there are in rugby. I don't remember any gold medalist track and field atheletes being in the NFL any time recently, and lets be honest, how does high jumping really play into being a great NFL player, it doesn't. YOu can jump as high as you want, but if you can't position yourself, or run good routes then you will be a worthless reciever. I can garuntee you that more rugby players would make it in the NFL then the other way around

Re: Best Athletes
 

No love for tennis? I personally don't think they're at the top, but at least give the pro players some consideration. They're basically playing every day of their life from the time they're 7 or 8. The men can play marathon 5-setters that last 5+ hours and their season covers every month except December. They have to be considered among some of the best athletes out there. Key word: considered.

Re: Best Athletes
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Sure. NFL, MLB, NBA, NASCAR.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nascar ahhhhh! I'd rather watch Arena Football or the Oxygen Network.

[/ QUOTE ]

You might, but the numbers don't lie. They have far and away surpassed the NHL in popularity, both measured with attendance and with TV ratings.

[/ QUOTE ]

NASCAR is a sport?

how a bunch of cars making constent left truns is considered entertainment is beyond me.

Re: Best Athletes
 

[ QUOTE ]
NASCAR is a sport?

how a bunch of cars making constent left truns is considered entertainment is beyond me.

[/ QUOTE ]

We've built the fastest car ever and have the best driver ever. Now watch him drive it around in circles.

Re: Best Athletes
 

[ QUOTE ]
sprinting is anarobic, the NFL is anarobic. Do you see how those and other track events that work with the NFL don't really work in rugby? I can garuntee you that Sivivatuu is just as good of a sprinter as any NFL player, and if you ever see Tonderai Chavanaga then you'd know that you haven't seen a faster sprinter in the NFL. THere are way more fat overweight players in the NFL then there are in rugby. I don't remember any gold medalist track and field atheletes being in the NFL any time recently, and lets be honest, how does high jumping really play into being a great NFL player, it doesn't. YOu can jump as high as you want, but if you can't position yourself, or run good routes then you will be a worthless reciever. I can garuntee you that more rugby players would make it in the NFL then the other way around

[/ QUOTE ]


Football is not anaerobic

No, perhaps no NFL player has won an olympic gold in sprinting or throwing, but John Capel was a Florida WR before becoming a world class sprinter and was still drafted in the NFL. Jonathan Ogden was a world class shot putter at UCLA. Michael Bennett ran a sub 10.1 100m and was a collegiate all american. I don't know who Sivivatu is, and I'm sure he's very fast, but can you guarantee that kind of speed?

Re: Best Athletes
 

I'm going to go with the NHL on this one, with consideration also for world-class rugby and soccer, as well as tennis.

Re: Best Athletes
 

The best athlete in TEAM sports has to be in the NHL. Granted there are some excellent athletes in every sport, but overall NHL players are top. Playing in a physically demanding 82 game season (not including playoffs), with one of the shortest off seasons is a lot. Getting and giving a hit in football and rugby takes a lot, but the its not the same in NHL were players are moving 2 to 3 times faster.

Re: Best Athletes
 

why are so many people confusing physical fitness with athletic ability? what definition are we using for athletic ability?
for me, this means the combination of speed, quickness, coordination and strength. Decathaletes probably fit this definition the best. for team sports, I'd go with hockey (and I hate hockey) or basketball.

for fitness, you can choose any of the ultra sports (ultra marathon, ironman, etc) and make a case. for team sports, I'd go with H2O polo or quiddich (don't matches sometimes stretch into days as the seekers look for the snitch?).

Re: Best Athletes
 

Many NBA or NFL players were also very good at other sports, because they are simply great athletes. This does not seem to be true at all with the NHL.

Re: Best Athletes
 

I saw Steve Atwater naked and he is a machine.