Re: Obvious collusion...worth pursuing?
 

She's very nice, congrats. Glad to hear she is spoiled too [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: Obvious collusion...worth pursuing?
 

[ QUOTE ]
We're overlooking the possibility that OnlyBusiness is just a moron.

[/ QUOTE ]

It does look bad, but we are forgetting that some people online are so bad they won't even realize that is an obvious call. The moran factor needs to be considered.

Re: Obvious collusion...worth pursuing?
 

[ QUOTE ]
I get the impression that Party Poker doesn't care much about collusion at low limit SNGs...should I even bother trying to get them to address this?

Seat 1: OnlyBusiness ( $2270 )
Seat 3: Hero ( $3080 )
Seat 6: Seat 6 ( $1350 )
Seat 7: Seat 7 ( $1045 )
Seat 8: OnlyPleasure ( $255 )
Blinds(100/200)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Hero [ Jc Th ]
OnlyBusiness calls [200].
Hero folds.
Seat 6 folds.
Seat 7 folds.
OnlyPleasure is all-In [55]
OnlyBusiness folds.
OnlyPleasure does not show cards.
OnlyPleasure wins 555 chips

[/ QUOTE ]

This happend to me once, I got my hand and with out thinking I clicked Check/Fold...action go to the SB and he raised all-in 70 and i folded...common mistake

Re: Obvious collusion...worth pursuing?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
On a different site I took the handle 'CutieKatie'.
First time I played on the site I was sitting right next to a guy from San Francisco named 'KatiesDad'.

[/ QUOTE ]

I should have signed up with ScrewingKatie and played at the table, too. It would have been quite the family event!

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

Re: Obvious collusion...worth pursuing?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I get the impression that Party Poker doesn't care much about collusion at low limit SNGs...should I even bother trying to get them to address this?

Seat 1: OnlyBusiness ( $2270 )
Seat 3: Hero ( $3080 )
Seat 6: Seat 6 ( $1350 )
Seat 7: Seat 7 ( $1045 )
Seat 8: OnlyPleasure ( $255 )
Blinds(100/200)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Hero [ Jc Th ]
OnlyBusiness calls [200].
Hero folds.
Seat 6 folds.
Seat 7 folds.
OnlyPleasure is all-In [55]
OnlyBusiness folds.
OnlyPleasure does not show cards.
OnlyPleasure wins 555 chips

[/ QUOTE ]

This happend to me once, I got my hand and with out thinking I clicked Check/Fold...action go to the SB and he raised all-in 70 and i folded...common mistake

[/ QUOTE ]

I never click the check/fold box for precisely this reason. I do check the auto check box a lot though.

It looked a lot like collusion to me given their names and the play, but given the results of their investigation, if true, it looks like one of those weird coincidences on the names combined with a boneheaded play.

Still, it looks suspicious enough that I'd think seriously about jumping tables if i saw them both on the same table. (Have to be paying pretty good attention to pick that up in a sit-n-go fast enough to jump off though.)



--Zetack

Re: Obvious collusion...worth pursuing?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
On a different site I took the handle 'CutieKatie'.
First time I played on the site I was sitting right next to a guy from San Francisco named 'KatiesDad'.

[/ QUOTE ]

I should have signed up with ScrewingKatie and played at the table, too. It would have been quite the family event!

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh my virgin eyes! [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]