Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Medium-Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=54)
-   -   Am I better 4-tabling 6 max NL200 on Party or at a live super fishy... (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=399630)

Karak567 12-16-2005 12:45 PM

Am I better 4-tabling 6 max NL200 on Party or at a live super fishy...
 
full ring NL200?

Everyone talks about how much better live games are but I can't see giving up 4-tabling on Party at NL200 6max for a super-fishy NL200 game (which I have access to).

What do you guys think? Is it possible one live game could be fishier than 4 6max Party games?

AcesUp2121 12-16-2005 12:49 PM

Re: Am I better 4-tabling 6 max NL200 on Party or at a live super fishy...
 
Generally live games are a joke in comparison to online games at this level. That being said, I get bored out of my mind playing live, as with 4 tabling I always have something going on. A night of cold cards live is really rough. It probably makes little difference in terms of one session of either.

Isura 12-16-2005 01:14 PM

Re: Am I better 4-tabling 6 max NL200 on Party or at a live super fish
 
[ QUOTE ]

Everyone talks about how much better live games are but I can't see giving up 4-tabling on Party at NL200 6max for a super-fishy NL200 game (which I have access to).

[/ QUOTE ]

This is obvious. You are surely going to make more quad-tabling NL200 on party than 1-tabling a 1/2 live game. It would be closer if you had a live 2/5 (deep stacked) or 5/10 live game comparable in difficulty to the party 1/2.

edge 12-16-2005 01:29 PM

Re: Am I better 4-tabling 6 max NL200 on Party or at a live super fish
 
Well, you can't order hot chocolates when you play on Party [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

yvesaint 12-16-2005 01:48 PM

Re: Am I better 4-tabling 6 max NL200 on Party or at a live super fish
 
[ QUOTE ]
Well, you can't order hot chocolates when you play on Party [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

mosuavea 12-16-2005 02:25 PM

Re: Am I better 4-tabling 6 max NL200 on Party or at a live super fish
 
[ QUOTE ]
Well, you can't order hot chocolates when you play on Party [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Sure I can, I tell my GF to get me one

swolfe 12-16-2005 02:25 PM

Re: Am I better 4-tabling 6 max NL200 on Party or at a live super fish
 
[ QUOTE ]
Well, you can't order hot chocolates when you play on Party [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

sure i can. "woman! bring me a hot chocolate! and some nachos!"


i've been playing a lot more live lately and haven't had a losing session in over a month. the same is not true with online.

also, online you can't straddle [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Percula 12-16-2005 02:28 PM

Re: Am I better 4-tabling 6 max NL200 on Party or at a live super fish
 
[ QUOTE ]

This is obvious. You are surely going to make more quad-tabling NL200 on party than 1-tabling a 1/2 live game. It would be closer if you had a live 2/5 (deep stacked) or 5/10 live game comparable in difficulty to the party 1/2.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is the right line of thought.

Unless your 1/2 game is very deep stacked and donktastic you are going to make more playing online.

But many of the 2/5, 3/5 and 5/5 games are deep enough and donktastic enough that it is about break even.

But if you can find a good 5/10 or 10/20, you are going to make more live. But more sharks swim in these waters than the 5 games... YMMV.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.