Possible to win at $50 NL 10 tabling w/o reads?
i'm a SnG player and I 10 table the 50+5's.
my perception between sng's and ring games is that reads dont help as much for me in SnGs. i just play my cards. i play tight early, and then become a pushbot when blinds are big. I heard that ring games are MUCH more read dependant. but i'm wondering is it possible to be a winning player at 10 tabling $50 NL w/o reads? if so, what $/hr? THX |
Re: Possible to win at $50 NL 10 tabling w/o reads?
yes it is very possible. though doesn't make it eaiser obviously.
|
Re: Possible to win at $50 NL 10 tabling w/o reads?
i 6-table for close to $45 / hr. this rate can only be done late in the evening when there are juicy tables. otherwise winrate is much lower since there are fewer atm machines dispensing cash.
|
Re: Possible to win at $50 NL 10 tabling w/o reads?
there are winning players 8-tabling $50, $100 and $200 NL full ring - not sure how many 6 max you can realistically play - I figure maybe 6
you will need: 2 hi res monitors PokerTracker PAHUD very good concentration skills |
Re: Possible to win at $50 NL 10 tabling w/o reads?
i only do full ring since 6 max is even more read dependant.
just asking about $/hr for 10 tabling $50 NL full ring WITHOUT any reads? |
Re: Possible to win at $50 NL 10 tabling w/o reads?
I'd guess about 1/4 of what you could make 5 tabling with reads....that's if you make anything at all..
|
Re: Possible to win at $50 NL 10 tabling w/o reads?
i would recommend playing only two tables while trying to learn the game and climb limits as fast as possible.
once you feel comfortable at a certain limit add more tables. esp. when coming from an sng background i dont think its a good idea to start out with some heavy multitabling. you will most likely make money but longterm i think the other approach is much better (IMHO) |
Re: Possible to win at $50 NL 10 tabling w/o reads?
[ QUOTE ]
I heard that ring games are MUCH more read dependant. [/ QUOTE ] They can be, but they don't have to be. A lot of the game is still correctly reading the strength of your hand, reading the action, using your options, then waiting for your opponents to mess up. [ QUOTE ] but i'm wondering is it possible to be a winning player at 10 tabling $50 NL w/o reads? if so, what $/hr? [/ QUOTE ] Yes, it is possible, particularly at slower full tables. I think it wouldn't be too hard to win 5 PTBB/100 by set-mining decently. There are other viable strategies that don't require much attention, either. If you buy in short, you can avoid most tough post-flop decisions and punish your loose opponents, much as in a tournament where your opponents limp too much. |
Re: Possible to win at $50 NL 10 tabling w/o reads?
I'm sure you could make decent money set mining but that isnt going to do anything for your game.
|
Re: Possible to win at $50 NL 10 tabling w/o reads?
I'm just curious but what is "set mining" ?
Thank you. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.