Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
 

Re: A very very well played hand, 200-400 on UB
 

Why isn't this a split?

Re: A very very well played hand, 200-400 on UB
 

[ QUOTE ]
Why isn't this a split?

[/ QUOTE ]

AKQ88 beats AK887....

gotta stop posting this late doug

Re: A very very well played hand, 200-400 on UB
 

heh.

Re: A very very well played hand, 200-400 on UB
 

[ QUOTE ]
Why isn't this a split?

[/ QUOTE ]

lol, quit drinking and posting [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: A very very well played hand, 200-400 on UB
 

River is a work of art. I like it.

I have a question about preflop, what was reasoning behind not 3 betting this particular time?

Re: A very very well played hand, 200-400 on UB
 

[ QUOTE ]
I have a question about preflop, what was reasoning behind not 3 betting this particular time?

[/ QUOTE ]

Leaving tempo aside...I assume it's an issue of play balancing/Shania.

He is probably defending 85-100% of his hands and by calling with strong hands X% of the time it may improve the winrate of all his calling hands more than it costs him by playing AQo suboptimally sometimes.

Re: A very very well played hand, 200-400 on UB
 

so what i see this stuff all the time on 5-10 party heads up games. the river is perfect because the K and the board will freeze him up and he'll just call often with some better hands and always with A high. but i think you lost some value on earlier streets but not putting in more action with the likely winner. you couldve:

reraised preflop
let it go 3 bets on the flop
c/red and called the turn

i think you left a some chips in his stack on this one.

Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
 

Re: A very very well played hand, 200-400 on UB
 

[ QUOTE ]

$.50 is raked from a pot of $2800.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's it?? What gives?? They rake over 3 dollars from some pots on the SSNL I play. Could someone please explain why the rake is so low here.