Re: Stats
 

[ QUOTE ]
cool stuff thanks. Are those stats for shorthanded games? My understanding of pokerroom stuff is that it is full ring.

[/ QUOTE ]
Actually, my stats are about 130K short games and 120K full games. I combined to two just to get a larger sample size. I can do just short if you'd like.

As far as pokerroom goes, they are a combination of all games as well. Once you start breaking it down by position and number of players, the accuracy of information really starts to deteriorate. Here , try it yourself.

Re: This play needs a name...
 

Actually King Yao is the real slim shady. If this play needs a name, hes the one that should give it. This is from a blog entry of his in May 2005. He also gives his reasons.





[ QUOTE ]

6 players 30-60

PreFlop:
I'm in big blind with AKo
UTG raises and UTG+1 calls. Both are new to me, but after two rounds, they seem to be fairly normal, nothing extreme.
I call because I am in horrible position to a UTG open-raiser and an early position cold caller. I want to see the Flop before I commit to the pot.

Flop: 9h-4c-9s rainbow
I check, UTG bets, UTG+1 folds, I call.
I'm not 100% sure what I'm going to do on the Turn. I'm thinking about check-calling it down, and letting AJ bet all the way, I don't think this is a good place to semi-bluff a check-raise on the Turn, the board is just not scary to a pair at all. Since I have AK, the two biggest scare cards make me the probable favorite. This means a Q or J are my best scare card semi-bluff check-raising cards, but they aren't that scary to someone who has TT. Therefore, I'm leaning towards just checking and calling...if no A or K shows up, I'm hoping he's got AQ or AJ.

Turn: Ah (two hearts on board now)
I check, looking to check-raise. He checks too. Did I miss a bet? Read on.

River: 3c - no possible flush.
Board: 9h-4c-9s-Ah-3c
Now I know how to get back the bet I missed on the Turn. I check. The combination of the check on the Turn and the River tells him that its doubtful I have an Ace. Who checks twice? Few people. It also tells me when he checked on the Turn he is likely to have a pocket pair. He is afraid of the Ace, yet he has a hand - so he doesn't need to use the Ace to bluff me out of the pot. Therefore, he's got a pocket pair.

I checked on the River, he bet, and I raised. He called. I won the pot.

So I won 2 bets on the Turn and the River combined. If I had bet out on the Turn, I would have only received a call on both Turn and River, thus winning the same thing. If he had bet on the Turn, then I would have probably made an extra bet if he had called my raise and called my River bet. The good thing here is I check-raised on the River after it the Turn was checked around, thus getting back the Turn bet that I "lost". If I had bet out on the River (after the Turn was checked), then I would have only made one bet...it was pretty clear he was going to bet the River with his pair (even though that's the wrong decision), so the check-raise was correct. I hope that makes sense. In the hand history, it showed he had 88.

Lessons to be learned:
1. Its ok to risk missing a bet if there is a good chance you can get the missed bet back on a later street while at the same time giving yourself an opportunity to win more (may have won 3 bets if he had bet on the Turn).

2. If you are playing against a solid player, don't be so sure about betting at the end like this player did. What could and would I call with that he could beat? Not that many hands. His bet on the River was bad...yes, you want to be aggressive in shorthanded games, but not always. If he knew I was a fish, then he should have bet, but I was unknown to him. As I wrote in Chapter 15: The River of Weighing the Odds in Hold'em Poker, if you only have a 50% chance of having the best hand, and you are last to act, you should check. Go buy the book and read that chapter for further details [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]



[/ QUOTE ]

Re: This play needs a name...
 

Fold or call a reraise?

Re: This play needs a name...
 

[ QUOTE ]
Fold or call a reraise?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think I get 3bet approximately never, but I probably call even though folding is probably correct.

Re: This play needs a name...
 

[ QUOTE ]


the button isnt raising after 2 limps and a poster without a legit hand. remove sand from vag plz.

[/ QUOTE ]

I play with some LAGs who would raise on the button in this hand with a pretty wide range. It doesn't matter what he's holding, the point is that if you have to pay two bets to see the flop OOP, this hand becomes a marginal loser. That said, I think I'm playing it here unless I have a strong read on the button that says no.

I don't dislike your turn/river play here (I like "knod" btw, very clever), but I think it's a fancy, as in non-standard, play. I'm donking most of the time. I think it would depend on what I think villain thinks about me.

Also, IMO c/r-ing the river induces a retarded three-bet often enough that you have to call one more. That's one of the risks you take when you make this play.

Re: This play needs a name...
 

Doesn't villain have AQ or AJ here a good portion of the time? Those hands will probably pay off a river bet, but will almost always take the free showdown.

Like JeffW said, I think donking the turn is way better.. you avoid giving free cards to gutshots and it looks like you're an idiot who picked up a FD or decided to donk his pair of 7s, so you get raised if villain has a legit hand.

Whoever said 'the soiler' as a name for a play, that name rules.


Also, what do you guys call a CR-CR-bet line when defending your BB? Is that a bifecta?

Re: This play needs a name...
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Fold or call a reraise?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think I get 3bet approximately never, but I probably call even though folding is probably correct.

[/ QUOTE ]

people fold trips? *tries to remember the last time he folded trips*

Re: This play needs a name...
 

[ QUOTE ]
Also, what do you guys call a CR-CR-bet line when defending your BB? Is that a bifecta?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ummmm....that would be an exacta.

Re: This play needs a name...
 

This play should be called the "hypersexy," or the "illusionary erectile dysfunction." If you want short and concise, I might also call it simply "balls," with or without a "z" replacing the "s."