do you see anything unusual here? (stat)
 

Up and down, up and down, when it should be up up up up [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

something completely off with these?

http://img396.imageshack.us/img396/9007/stat4gi.jpg http://img383.imageshack.us/img383/7844/kppyr3se.jpg

Re: do you see anything unusual here? (stat)
 

You need to play more hands. vpip for 6 max should be between 25 and 30. Steal more blinds and learn to defend when you are in the blinds. I'm sceptical to tell you to see more showdowns, but it looks to me like you are not snapping off enough bluffs on the river.

Why do you check so much after a preflop raise? My stat is 3.94%, yours is 14%.

Just my .02. Not sure what it's worth. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

Re: do you see anything unusual here? (stat)
 

Im trying to lower my "folded to river bet" by inducing bluffs on the turn but I think you are overdoing this. Im at 1.8 on the river with 50% folded to a river bet.

Re: do you see anything unusual here? (stat)
 

[ QUOTE ]
You need to play more hands. vpip for 6 max should be between 25 and 30. Steal more blinds and learn to defend when you are in the blinds. I'm sceptical to tell you to see more showdowns, but it looks to me like you are not snapping off enough bluffs on the river.

Why do you check so much after a preflop raise? My stat is 3.94%, yours is 14%.

Just my .02. Not sure what it's worth. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
Im at 8% here. Are you betting into 3 opponents almost all the time if you raised pf and didnt hit? Im betting around 95% into two opponents and 100% into one if I miss. Probably around 30% if I miss vs 3.

Re: do you see anything unusual here? (stat)
 

Have you read the Wookie's 6-max Stats FAQ? There are some good guidelines there.

It looks to me like you're too tight. You also don't value bet nearly enough on the river. Your river aggression is anemic.

You might get more responses if you post here, in the official stats thread.

Re: do you see anything unusual here? (stat)
 

"Up and down, up and down, when it should be up up up up "

actually, it turns out to be the first more than then second.

it has to be said, and i'm going to say it.

all you need to do is increase "bb/100 hands" by 2 or 3.

Re: do you see anything unusual here? (stat)
 

I check if I am against >3 opponents and I don't catch anything. I bet 100 % if HU, 99 % if against 2 [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: do you see anything unusual here? (stat)
 

[ QUOTE ]
I check if I am against >3 opponents and I don't catch anything. I bet 100 % if HU, 99 % if against 2

[/ QUOTE ]

That's pretty rigid, and you're overlooking other important factors, namely the character of your opponents and the texture of the board. This thread with some advice from Deception5 gives a good idea of what you're looking for, though it isn't quite as broad as you may need.

Also, I'd be very surprised if you really are against more than three people and missed the board 14% of the time. I guess it's not impossible, but a reasonable amount of your raises should be with pocket pairs, so missing the board isn't an issue, and are there really that many >3-handed flops in 6-max when a raise is put in? If so, I need to switch sites.

Re: do you see anything unusual here? (stat)
 

Of course I look at those factors (texture of the board etc.) too...

I was being very general.

Nice link though.

(just come to party... they will call)

Re: do you see anything unusual here? (stat)
 

You're checking and calling way too much, especially on the turn and the river. Value bet more.

Rob