Re: Scenarios for Top 2 Picks in 2006 NFL Draft
 

[ QUOTE ]
Every one of those teams neds D Brick, but at least for Houston/SF, they need Bush to rejuvenate the franchise

[/ QUOTE ]

houston and sf need huge help on the o-line, but sf is seriously lacking talent in the skill positions and simply HAVE to take bush if they get the chance too.

with the niners luck they lose to the texans and get the first pick, only to have bush stay his senior year. ahahah. they sure as hell can't pick leinart and no matter how good D'Brick is, it'll be a dissappointment to take him first esp. with all this Bush talk.

Re: Scenarios for Top 2 Picks in 2006 NFL Draft
 

[ QUOTE ]
Every one of those teams neds D Brick, but at least for Houston/SF, they need Bush to rejuvenate the franchise

[/ QUOTE ]

If healthy the niners O-line could be pretty decent. Jennings, Smiley, Newberry, Baas, Harris is an above average group of talent, they've just never been healthy together yet.

Re: Scenarios for Top 2 Picks in 2006 NFL Draft
 

Okay, seriously. Houston drafting Bush with the #1 would be the dumbest thing in history. Have any of you SEEN Domanick Davis play?

Re: Scenarios for Top 2 Picks in 2006 NFL Draft
 

the best thing to do with the number 1 pick is to trade it. this is true every year. these teams are so bad that one player is not gonna make a difference.

Re: Scenarios for Top 2 Picks in 2006 NFL Draft
 

[ QUOTE ]
Okay, seriously. Houston drafting Bush with the #1 would be the dumbest thing in history. Have any of you SEEN Domanick Davis play?

[/ QUOTE ]

if davis is so good then they should definitely trade the pick. or, they should trade davis, and draft bush.

Re: Scenarios for Top 2 Picks in 2006 NFL Draft
 

If you are talking about Ferguson he would be a reasonable pick at #2

Re: Scenarios for Top 2 Picks in 2006 NFL Draft
 

[ QUOTE ]
the best thing to do with the number 1 pick is to trade it. this is true every year. these teams are so bad that one player is not gonna make a difference.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know about this.

2002 Bengals were 2-14 and picked Carson Palmer and are now one of the league's elite teams.

The same arguement could be made for Peyton Manning, Mike Vick, even Orlando Pace. Most of the teams who had the #1 pick and aren't the Cleveland Browns have turned things around quickly after taking the best player in the draft.

Not saying these picks are the only thing that flipped these teams fortunes, but they were certainly a big part of the solution.

I don't know if Reggie Bush is that guy or not, but I think he could be.

For number 2 picks, the 2001 Panthers were 1-15 picked Julius Peppers #2 and were in the Superbowl 2 Years later. McNabb certainly turned his franchise around, but the rest of the recent picks have been busts.

Re: Scenarios for Top 2 Picks in 2006 NFL Draft
 

bengals are good bc marvin overhauled the oline and defense and filled the skill position with talented players picked in later rounds.

colts sucked for years with peyton (ask jim mora) and recently have made the additions to make the team successful.

i can buy vick. dude can turn franchises around.

pace is not gonna turn a team around. faulk, 3 awesome recievers and a long shot qb will tho.

Re: Scenarios for Top 2 Picks in 2006 NFL Draft
 

[ QUOTE ]
colts sucked for years with peyton

[/ QUOTE ]

Wrong.

Peyton's rookie year (1998) they went 3-13. They had one blip after that, in 2001 (6-10). Every other year they've won at least 10 games. I'll grant you they haven't been great in the playoffs, but "sucked" is a little too strong.

Re: Scenarios for Top 2 Picks in 2006 NFL Draft
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
colts sucked for years with peyton

[/ QUOTE ]

Wrong.

Peyton's rookie year (1998) they went 3-13. They had one blip after that, in 2001 (6-10). Every other year they've won at least 10 games. I'll grant you they haven't been great in the playoffs, but "sucked" is a little too strong.

[/ QUOTE ]

The Colts pretty much sucked in 1998, 1999, 2001, and 2002. Wow, weird saying that a team that went 13-3 sucked, but that team wasn't very good at all.

It's really only been the last three years that they've been good. And 2000.