Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   One-table Tournaments (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   Locked Myself Away (3 Day Binge, Content) (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=279247)

Myst 06-25-2005 06:39 PM

Re: Locked Myself Away (3 Day Binge, Content)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I know i keep saying this and i am mostly ignored but I think never coming in last like that is a cause of concern.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm sure you're right to some extent. But at the 20+2s, I'm almost positive that having more than a few last places is a much bigger cause for concern. Higher the buyin, more willing you should be to gamble early, and thus risk busting early.

-Phoenix

[/ QUOTE ]

No. Incorrect thinking. You should never "gamble" at any buyin (and by gamble, I mean take coinflips), if you feel you have a significant edge over your competition. This is true at the $6 sngs, and is true at the $5000 sngs.

Phoenix1010 06-25-2005 06:43 PM

Re: Locked Myself Away (3 Day Binge, Content)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I know i keep saying this and i am mostly ignored but I think never coming in last like that is a cause of concern.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm sure you're right to some extent. But at the 20+2s, I'm almost positive that having more than a few last places is a much bigger cause for concern. Higher the buyin, more willing you should be to gamble early, and thus risk busting early.

-Phoenix

[/ QUOTE ]

No. Incorrect thinking. You should never "gamble" at any buyin (and by gamble, I mean take coinflips), if you feel you have a significant edge over your competition. This is true at the $6 sngs, and is true at the $5000 sngs.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're taking "gamble" too seriously. I meant you should be less afraid of getting involved in big pots early. This means taking advantage of smaller edges, and using your control over your opponents to an advantage.

-Phoenix

Seth Money 06-26-2005 04:04 AM

FINAL UPDATE
 
Finished In The Positive But I Clearly Have Learned A Lesson..... Play Within Ur Roll. As You'll See Below

20+2's

Total $638
Rakeback = $73.36
ROI = 22.1% (without Rakeback)
ITM = 38.9%
1st 15% 19
2nd 13% 17
3rd 12% 15
4th 6% 8
5th 9% 12
6th 11% 14
7th 13% 17
8th 8% 11
9th 7% 9
10th 7% 9

Total 131


30+3's

Rakeback $52.08
($186.00)
ROI = -9%
ITM = 30.4%
1st 11% 7
2nd 5% 3
3rd 15% 9
4th 11% 7
5th 10% 6
6th 5% 3
7th 11% 7
8th 8% 5
9th 6% 4
10th 18% 11

Total 100% 62


50+5's

Rakeback = $32.2
($465.00)
ROI = -36.8%
ITM = 21.7%
1st 4% 1
2nd 13% 3
3rd 4% 1
4th 4% 1
5th 17% 4
6th
7th 30% 7
8th 4% 1
9th 13% 3
10th 9% 2

Total 100% 23

Angelic_Ace 06-26-2005 04:19 AM

Re: FINAL UPDATE
 
Looks like you had a meltdown - your stats looked like a
decent 20 player but nothing spectacular, and you jumped up into the 50s which are a very different ballgame. Hope you still come out ahead bud. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

Seth Money 06-26-2005 09:16 AM

Re: FINAL UPDATE
 
Thanks, I think. And by the way. I did finish ahead as I posted the final update hahahah


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.