Winrate question
 

what kind of ptbb/100 is attianable in mid-high stakes PLO online?

did a search, but had no luck

thx

Re: Winrate question
 

5 is good, 10 would be outstanding.

Re: Winrate question
 

[ QUOTE ]
5 is good, 10 would be outstanding.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. Others think that as much as 15ptb/100 is possible but I think that even with excellent game selection you'd be crushing at 10ptb/100 at midlimits (which to me is 1/2 blinds and up).

Re: Winrate question
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
5 is good, 10 would be outstanding.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. Others think that as much as 15ptb/100 is possible but I think that even with excellent game selection you'd be crushing at 10ptb/100 at midlimits (which to me is 1/2 blinds and up).

[/ QUOTE ]

I think this would be a good addition to the faq

Re: Winrate question
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
5 is good, 10 would be outstanding.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. Others think that as much as 15ptb/100 is possible but I think that even with excellent game selection you'd be crushing at 10ptb/100 at midlimits (which to me is 1/2 blinds and up).

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm sure most of the people that claim 15 don't have near a sample size to support this. There is always a lot of BS posted in winrate threads. Sure you can run good at 15 for a while but that would be a crazy winrate to sustain. I'd be suprised if many people above 1/2 have 10 or > in 100,000 + hands.

That said I think in good games I think you might be able to win more then hold'em, but the variance is of course much higher. But with the small number of games running at 1/2 and above I think it is probably much harder to win more in PLO then NL Hold'em if you want to play alot.