Standing on principles
 

Kay Bailey Hutchinson (R) of Texas:

[ QUOTE ]
And secondly, I certainly hope that if there is going to be an indictment that says something happened, that it is an indictment on a crime and not some perjury technicality where they couldn't indict on the crime and so they go to something just to show that their two years of investigation was not a waste of time and taxpayer dollars.

[/ QUOTE ]

Could it be that she said this some 8 odd years ago? Or was it this week?

Re: Standing on principles
 

Sounds like she's talking about Martha Stewart.

Re: Standing on principles
 

Hmmm, I thought this was going to be a thread about rowdy schoolchildren. Disappointing. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Re: Standing on principles
 

Isn't perjury a crime? Am I missing something?

Re: Standing on principles
 

I don't know about you but I think blantant perjury is a pretty big crime for a public official no matter who it is.

-Gryph

Re: Standing on principles
 

[ QUOTE ]
I don't know about you but I think blantant perjury is a pretty big crime for a public official no matter who it is.

-Gryph

[/ QUOTE ]

Wull, uh, now, doehn thay-yut duh-pend on whut-chur definishun of "izz" izz?

[img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

Re: Standing on principles
 

I was quoting Kay Bailey.

Perjury is a crime if the alleged perjurer is of the other party.