Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Beginners Questions (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=30)
-   -   What now? (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=406078)

th3 mol3 12-27-2005 06:39 PM

What now?
 
Hey everyone, this is one of my first posts here as you can see. I've been reading the forums for at least 9 months now, and thanks to everyone that contributes here I've managed to improve my game considerably since I started (with thanks to SSHE and Harrington on Hold Em as well [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img])

Anyway, I started off on Total Poker/Landora Poker with $20 on the micro-limits and worked my way up, slowly but surely. I played mostly full table limit and NL, and have made a nice amount over the past year or so. Unfortunately, I just went on my worst run EVER there and I don't have anything left now. Fortunately, I decided to put some money on Pacific Poker a while ago and I have been doing well on the short-handed tables there, so I still have a fairly healthy bankroll (enough for 10/20 limit).

Anyway, enough of my life story. Basically, I need some guidance on what I should do next, I'm not sure if I want to carry on with short-handed limit because of the variance. I'm thinking of multi-tabling SnG's on Party Poker because I've had good success at tournaments recently, and I believe the variance will be lower? I don't mind grinding out the cash, I would prefer to do that then take massive bankroll hits. Soooooo, what game would be best for this? Cheers [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

highlife 12-27-2005 06:45 PM

Re: What now?
 
it would be much easier to answer this question if you tell us what exactly your bankroll is.

the variance on SnG's is not lower than cash games i don't believe, but there are others on here who can better attest to that.

th3 mol3 12-27-2005 06:48 PM

Re: What now?
 
Yeh, I should have just said I guess. It's around $5,500.

th3 mol3 12-27-2005 11:07 PM

Re: What now?
 
Well, I've just had a three hour session on Pacific Poker 10/20 limit and I'm up $1000 [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Maybe I should stick to short-handed for a bit longer.

DcifrThs 12-27-2005 11:35 PM

Re: What now?
 
[ QUOTE ]
Well, I've just had a three hour session on Pacific Poker 10/20 limit and I'm up $1000 [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Maybe I should stick to short-handed for a bit longer.

[/ QUOTE ]

SH is higher variance.

6500 is not a full roll for 10/20 limit.

discretion at this point in your poker career is the far better part of valor.

Barron

tubalkain 12-28-2005 12:14 AM

Re: What now?
 
[ QUOTE ]
Yeh, I should have just said I guess. It's around $5,500.

[/ QUOTE ]

Drop back to 5/10 SH and/or $50 SNG's. Variance is your enemy right now.

th3 mol3 12-28-2005 08:01 AM

Re: What now?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Well, I've just had a three hour session on Pacific Poker 10/20 limit and I'm up $1000 [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Maybe I should stick to short-handed for a bit longer.

[/ QUOTE ]

SH is higher variance.

6500 is not a full roll for 10/20 limit.

discretion at this point in your poker career is the far better part of valor.

Barron

[/ QUOTE ]

So, the 300xBB rule doesn't apply to short-handed?

tubalkain 12-28-2005 10:54 AM

Re: What now?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Well, I've just had a three hour session on Pacific Poker 10/20 limit and I'm up $1000 [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Maybe I should stick to short-handed for a bit longer.

[/ QUOTE ]

SH is higher variance.

6500 is not a full roll for 10/20 limit.

discretion at this point in your poker career is the far better part of valor.

Barron

[/ QUOTE ]

So, the 300xBB rule doesn't apply to short-handed?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not sure of the exact rule of thumb for 6-max play, but I'd guess 500xBB at the absolute minimum. Those SH games can have some wicked variance, as evidenced by your +50xBB session. You could just have easily wound up on the losing end of that run...

th3 mol3 12-28-2005 11:55 AM

Re: What now?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Well, I've just had a three hour session on Pacific Poker 10/20 limit and I'm up $1000 [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Maybe I should stick to short-handed for a bit longer.

[/ QUOTE ]

SH is higher variance.

6500 is not a full roll for 10/20 limit.

discretion at this point in your poker career is the far better part of valor.

Barron

[/ QUOTE ]

So, the 300xBB rule doesn't apply to short-handed?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not sure of the exact rule of thumb for 6-max play, but I'd guess 500xBB at the absolute minimum. Those SH games can have some wicked variance, as evidenced by your +50xBB session. You could just have easily wound up on the losing end of that run...

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, yes, I've been playing long enough to realize this and I have had some awful sessions of 6-max online. Thanks for the advice on bankroll, though. Guess I'll play it a bit safer now.

kenberman 12-28-2005 11:58 AM

Re: What now?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Well, I've just had a three hour session on Pacific Poker 10/20 limit and I'm up $1000 [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Maybe I should stick to short-handed for a bit longer.

[/ QUOTE ]

SH is higher variance.

6500 is not a full roll for 10/20 limit.

discretion at this point in your poker career is the far better part of valor.

Barron

[/ QUOTE ]

So, the 300xBB rule doesn't apply to short-handed?

[/ QUOTE ]

500 BB is safer, especially if you're playing in aggro games.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.