Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Other Other Topics (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=32)
-   -   "Saw" (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=149999)

Malone Brown 11-16-2004 09:48 PM

\"Saw\"
 
Anyone seen this movie yet? Watched it last night, have to say it's probably the freakiest movie I've seen in a long time, maybe ever. Oppinions?

ilya 11-16-2004 09:57 PM

Re: \"Saw\"
 
I thought the scenarious were inventive and the supporting cast was good but the two leads were horrible (especially the guy who played the doctor. Cary Elwes or something like that?). I also really didn't like the spastic editing in the flashbacks. On the whole I'd give it maybe a 5/10?

Alobar 11-17-2004 02:24 AM

Re: \"Saw\"
 
I liked it. The acting was horrible, and that's an understatement. The cool plot and the creepyness of it made up for it though. I'd recommend it to anyone who likes that type of movie.

The coolest thing though was the previews before the movie. One for "Ring Two" and another one for Rob Zombies new movie. Kickass

nothumb 11-17-2004 02:30 AM

Re: \"Saw\"
 
I watched "Saw," "The Grudge," and "The Ring" all in the same week.

'Saw' has a great plot, good scenarios, really twisted. Probably the least scary of the three as it is more freakish and disturbing and less about creepy scenes or surprises. Know what I mean? Like, you don't jump out of your seat, you are just kind of pushed back in it going, "That's really horrible. Aggh! That's so [censored] up." Plot twists in Saw are way better than the other two.

"The Grudge" surprised me in that it was PG-13. It had some definite gore in it but no sex so I guess it's suitable for a 7th grader. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

It was actually pretty scary. I thought it was good.

"The Ring" had Naomi Watts, so I was having a hard time being scared because I was so busy ejaculating. However, it had an interesting thriller/mystery plot, and some pretty good plot twists, but wasn't that scary either. This movie actually deserved the PG-13 rating. However, it was still creepy and I enjoyed it a lot. Powerful without being totally terrifying.

I would say a horror movie fan should see all three. If I had to say favorites, I would say Saw, The Ring, The Grudge in that order. But they are all decent.

NT

ArchAngel71857 11-17-2004 10:04 AM

Re: \"Saw\"
 
another one for Rob Zombies new movie. Kickass

You should be shot.

Unless it's a joke, then it's really funny.

-AA

Rushmore 11-17-2004 11:51 AM

Naomi Watts??!
 
[ QUOTE ]
"The Ring" had Naomi Watts, so I was having a hard time being scared because I was so busy ejaculating.

[/ QUOTE ]

I honestly cannot believe that a healthy heterosexual male could have this reaction to Naomi Watts, particularly in The Ring.

Is it the bad dye job? The slim hips? The nothing-special breastesses?

Or maybe it's just that Entertainment Tonight tells us that she is "hot," sort of like Sarah Michelle Gellar (horsefacey), Meg Ryan (10-yr-old boy body, rictus mouth), or Julia Roberts (two gigantic scarlet slugs for lips, eyes buggin out).

The emperor is still naked, regardless of what ET tells us.

Alobar 11-17-2004 11:58 AM

Re: \"Saw\"
 
[ QUOTE ]
another one for Rob Zombies new movie. Kickass

You should be shot.

Unless it's a joke, then it's really funny.

-AA

[/ QUOTE ]

Not even. Rob Zombies first movie was the [censored]

Alobar 11-17-2004 12:01 PM

Re: Naomi Watts??!
 
[ QUOTE ]


Or maybe it's just that Entertainment Tonight tells us that she is "hot," sort of like Sarah Michelle Gellar (horsefacey), Meg Ryan (10-yr-old boy body, rictus mouth), or Julia Roberts (two gigantic scarlet slugs for lips, eyes buggin out).

The emperor is still naked, regardless of what ET tells us.

[/ QUOTE ]

Naomi watts is hot. But I guess if you don't like attractive blond girls with nice bodies thats fine too [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Sarah Michelle gellar is very fuckable (the grudge sucked ass tho). I'll give you Meg Ryan and Julia Roberts tho, they are both ugly In my book.

Rushmore 11-17-2004 12:08 PM

Re: Naomi Watts??!
 
[ QUOTE ]
Naomi watts is hot. But I guess if you don't like attractive blond girls with nice bodies thats fine too

Sarah Michelle gellar is very fuckable (the grudge sucked ass tho). I'll give you Meg Ryan and Julia Roberts tho, they are both ugly In my book.

[/ QUOTE ]

I love attractive blonde girls with great bodies. I just don't see that when I look at Naomi Watts.

F#*kable? Of course Sarah Michelle Gellar is f%*kable. Absolutely. But she's no more f*@kable than the girl who lives a few doors down from me, and I don't get all in a twist over her, I just think she's sort of f*#kable.

Thanks for agreeing that Meg Ryan and Julia Roberts are hideous freaks. It means a lot to me, because sometimes I think I might be a homosexual, what with all of the hot celebrity-types who just don't do it for me.

My goodness, I hope that I am not a homosexual, even though the television machine tells me pretty clearly that this would be an improvement.

Alobar 11-17-2004 02:17 PM

Re: Naomi Watts??!
 
You ever notice that it's only women that go on and on about how good looking julia roberts and meg ryan are? I hardly ever hear some dude say, "damn meg ryan is a [censored] hottie!!".

I think you are more likely to be gay if you actually think those two are hot.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.