Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   One-table Tournaments (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   Should I have called this on a $33? (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=298431)

stu55 07-22-2005 04:53 PM

Should I have called this on a $33?
 
#Game No : 2405720084
***** Hand History for Game 2405720084 *****
NL Texas Hold'em $30 Buy-in + $3 Entry Fee Trny:14158682 Level:5 Blinds(75/150) - Friday, July 22, 16:41:52 EDT 2005
Table Table 11182 (Real Money)
Seat 1 is the button
Total number of players : 7
Seat 1: nickapr29 ( $1335 )
Seat 4: balsamicbill ( $1130 )
Seat 10: WildcatUK ( $2505 )
Seat 5: semaj78 ( $840 )
Seat 6: Pfleghaar ( $875 )
Seat 8: NMMS12 ( $620 )
Seat 3: rickyjayhawk ( $695 )
Trny:14158682 Level:5
Blinds(75/150)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to balsamicbill [ 7h 7c ]
semaj78 folds.
Pfleghaar folds.
NMMS12 is all-In [620]
WildcatUK calls [620].
nickapr29 folds.
rickyjayhawk is all-In [620]
balsamicbill folds.
WildcatUK calls [75].
** Dealing Flop ** [ 9h, 7d, 4c ]
** Dealing Turn ** [ Ts ]
** Dealing River ** [ 2s ]
rickyjayhawk shows [ 8h, 8s ] a pair of eights.
NMMS12 shows [ 9s, Ah ] a pair of nines.
WildcatUK shows [ 6c, 6s ] a pair of sixes.
rickyjayhawk wins 150 chips from side pot #1 with a pair of eights.
NMMS12 wins 2010 chips from the main pot with a pair of nines.
Game #2405722503 starts.

UMTerp 07-22-2005 04:54 PM

Re: Should I have called this on a $33?
 
No, and it's not close. Honestly, you probably shouldn't even be playing the $33's if you're asking that. There were THREE all-ins in front of you. It's debateable whether to call or not with even one in front of you.

Superfluous Man 07-22-2005 05:01 PM

Re: Should I have called this on a $33?
 
Would you be asking this question if the 7d that came on the flop was the 2d?

(Hint: no)

microbet 07-22-2005 05:15 PM

Re: Should I have called this on a $33?
 
I was wondering whether your other post was really a bad beat post. With this bad woulda-beat post in evidence, I think it was.

liucipher 07-22-2005 05:19 PM

Re: Should I have called this on a $33?
 
I don't think this qualifies as "bad beat" since he didn't play the hand + wasn't winning preflop.

I think a new category of "bad raise" hands needs to be created. "I would flopped trip twos with my 72o, but that IDIOT raised in front of me w/ AA!"

microbet 07-22-2005 05:19 PM

Re: Should I have called this on a $33?
 
I'm really just disappointed in myself. In responding to the bad beat post I was just cherry-picking an easy question.

microbet 07-22-2005 05:21 PM

Re: Should I have called this on a $33?
 
The bad beat post was here.

stu55 07-22-2005 07:25 PM

Re: Should I have called this on a $33?
 
Figure I should defend my position, first off it wasnt my money so I wasnt trying my hardest, but seeing all the action, would 77 be that far behind?

11t 07-22-2005 07:26 PM

Re: Should I have called this on a $33?
 
If your pattern mapper says you are gonna hit a set, of course you call.

Easy fold.

11t 07-22-2005 07:28 PM

Re: Should I have called this on a $33?
 
"would 77 be that far behind?"

Yes

DYSW?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.