This has probably been answered many times by now but
 

wanted to see if theres a consensus here.Tommorrow im going to buy one so....I should just read the other topics! but i dont feel like it.PLEASE VOTE.

Re: This has probably been answered many times by now but
 

Amazon is selling them both for $45 USD I think, as a package deal.

--Dave.

Re: This has probably been answered many times by now but
 

Thats a good idea...

Re: This has probably been answered many times by now but
 

I kinda liked you before this post, Bryce. [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]

Re: This has probably been answered many times by now but
 

[ QUOTE ]
I kinda liked you before this post, Bryce. [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
Its ok no one likes me, I [censored] up everything. I'm used to it.

Re: This has probably been answered many times by now but
 

If you are primarily interested in Omaha hi-low, SS2 would be much better than Harrington.

Re: This has probably been answered many times by now but
 

Hahaha, as we all know Harrington on Hold Em is one of the best O8 books ever.

Re: This has probably been answered many times by now but
 

[ QUOTE ]
I kinda liked you before this post, Bryce. [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
Let's get this straight. You open a thread that is titled "This has probably been answered many times by now but" and then make a comment about how you don't like that this is a question that has been asked before. If you don't want to read it, don't open the thread.

Re: This has probably been answered many times by now but
 

Silly question. If you are buying the book for NLHE, Harrington is better. If you are buying it for any other game that is covered in SS2 but not by Harrington, clearly SS2 will be more useful.

I am newly addicted to 2-7 Triple Draw -- not sure if DN's chapter in SS2 on that is the best strategy but its the only substantive discussion of the topic in print.

Re: This has probably been answered many times by now but
 

[ QUOTE ]
Let's get this straight. You open a thread that is titled "This has probably been answered many times by now but" and then make a comment about how you don't like that this is a question that has been asked before. If you don't want to read it, don't open the thread.

[/ QUOTE ]

Let's get this straight. Just because you preface the post with "This has probably been answered many times by now but" doesn't make it any less asinine or redundant. And I didn't make any comment about not liking that the question having been asked before.