Nobel jury again uses Peace Prize to bash Bush
 

Nobel Peace Prize Goes To El-Baradei

He's another Jimmy Carter in terms of contributing nothing to world pease.

Re: Nobel jury again uses Peace Prize to bash Bush
 

It's a sad day when people are lampooned as useless for being right.

http://thinkprogress.org/2005/04/27/...ds-it-getting/

[ QUOTE ]
He Was Right About Nuclear Weapons: IAEA Director ElBaradei told the United Nations that nuclear experts had found no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. In February 2003, he warned the White House “We have to date found no evidence of ongoing prohibited nuclear or nuclear-related activities in Iraq.” President Bush’s nomination to the U.N., John Bolton, attacked him, saying that was “impossible to believe.” (Today, two years after the invasion of Iraq, no weapons of mass destruction have been found and, in fact, the “intelligence” provided by Bolton’s Office of Special Plans turned out to be “dead wrong.”)

-

He Was Right About Uranium: In March 2003, El Baradei said the “documents which formed the basis for [the White House’s assertion] of recent uranium transactions between Iraq and Niger are in fact not authentic.” Vice President Cheney, asked about this a week later, said, “Mr. El Baradei frankly is wrong.” (The documents turned out to be fakes. Cheney, frankly, was wrong.)

-

He Was Right About Aluminum Tubes: In March 2003, ElBaradei said nuclear experts found “no indication” that Iraq tried to import high-strength aluminum tubes for a centrifuge to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice ignored that finding and claimed in July 2003 that “the consensus view” in the intelligence community was that the tubes “were suitable for use in centrifuges to spin material for nuclear weapons.” (The tubes, in fact, were not for use for weaponizing uranium. They were the wrong size — “too narrow, too heavy, too long” for a centrifuge. They had a special coating to protect them from the weather, which was “not consistent” with use in a centrifuge, as it could cause bad reactions with uranium.)

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: Nobel jury again uses Peace Prize to bash Bush
 

Peace-prize givers generally do bash war-mongerers. It's sort of implicit.

Re: Nobel jury again uses Peace Prize to bash Bush
 

You kind of have to mock common sense and reality to support Bush. So, this thread is rather 'business as usual.'

Re: Nobel jury again uses Peace Prize to bash Bush
 

Yeah and who's going to listen to a guy with a terrorist-sounding name anyway? BushCo can certainly be forgiven for this.

Re: Nobel jury again uses Peace Prize to bash Bush
 

[ QUOTE ]
Peace-prize givers generally do bash war-mongerers. It's sort of implicit.

[/ QUOTE ]

nh

Although I will say that this El Baradei guy doesn't sound like he's supporting the troops. He must not be a patriot.

Re: Nobel jury again uses Peace Prize to bash Bush
 

Give pease a chance.

Re: Nobel jury again uses Peace Prize to bash Bush
 

[ QUOTE ]
Peace-prize givers generally do bash war-mongerers. It's sort of implicit.

[/ QUOTE ]

What about the ones that are themselves warmongers?

Re: Nobel jury again uses Peace Prize to bash Bush
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Nobel Peace Prize Goes To El-Baradei

He's another Jimmy Carter in terms of contributing nothing to world pease.

[/ QUOTE ]

Give pease a chance.

[/ QUOTE ]

Carter and ElBaradei - like two pease in a pod.

Re: Nobel jury again uses Peace Prize to bash Bush
 

[ QUOTE ]
It's a sad day when people are lampooned as useless for being right.

http://thinkprogress.org/2005/04/27/...ds-it-getting/

[ QUOTE ]
He Was Right About Nuclear Weapons: IAEA Director ElBaradei told the United Nations that nuclear experts had found no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. In February 2003, he warned the White House “We have to date found no evidence of ongoing prohibited nuclear or nuclear-related activities in Iraq.” President Bush’s nomination to the U.N., John Bolton, attacked him, saying that was “impossible to believe.” (Today, two years after the invasion of Iraq, no weapons of mass destruction have been found and, in fact, the “intelligence” provided by Bolton’s Office of Special Plans turned out to be “dead wrong.”)

-

He Was Right About Uranium: In March 2003, El Baradei said the “documents which formed the basis for [the White House’s assertion] of recent uranium transactions between Iraq and Niger are in fact not authentic.” Vice President Cheney, asked about this a week later, said, “Mr. El Baradei frankly is wrong.” (The documents turned out to be fakes. Cheney, frankly, was wrong.)

-

He Was Right About Aluminum Tubes: In March 2003, ElBaradei said nuclear experts found “no indication” that Iraq tried to import high-strength aluminum tubes for a centrifuge to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice ignored that finding and claimed in July 2003 that “the consensus view” in the intelligence community was that the tubes “were suitable for use in centrifuges to spin material for nuclear weapons.” (The tubes, in fact, were not for use for weaponizing uranium. They were the wrong size — “too narrow, too heavy, too long” for a centrifuge. They had a special coating to protect them from the weather, which was “not consistent” with use in a centrifuge, as it could cause bad reactions with uranium.)

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

But he hasn't DONE anything! There are probably 13 million people who can lay claim to the statements ( or sentiments ) that you post here -- do they all get one?