Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   One-table Tournaments (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   Results for 435 $109 SnG's (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=90882)

Bozeman 06-02-2004 02:52 PM

Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
 
Since I have now moved up to $215, I thought I'd post results for all the $109 SnG's I've played.

Bankroll progression:

http://home.earthlink.net/~craighowa...0/money435.gif

Place probability:

http://home.earthlink.net/~craighowa...0/place435.gif

ROI seems to be approaching a constant. Note that after 100 I had a significantly different ROI.

http://home.earthlink.net/~craighowa...oidecay435.gif

FWIW,
Craig

BeerMoney 06-02-2004 04:53 PM

Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
 

Cool man, that's informative.
Thanks.

Jason Strasser 06-02-2004 06:17 PM

Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
 
Nice results. Your ROI is very solid.

benjdm 06-02-2004 10:25 PM

Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
 
Very nice.

JayWin 06-03-2004 01:10 AM

Is it from Party Poker or some other site?
 
Is it from Party Poker or some other site?

BradleyT 06-03-2004 01:19 AM

Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
 
Did you ever answer me when you first posted your charts months ago what program you used for the charting?

eastbay 06-03-2004 02:26 AM

Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
 
In games 100-240, there is a noticeable plateau. Did you consciously make any strategy adjustments to get either into or out of that plateau?

eastbay

t_perkin 06-03-2004 01:02 PM

Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
 
Have you tried splitting this buy Time of Day, start/middle/end of session or day of the week?

I would be interested to see. if you can be bothered....

Tim

Bozeman 06-03-2004 03:19 PM

Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
 
I use MicrosoftWorksSpreadsheet, even though it sucks.

Craig

Bozeman 06-03-2004 03:22 PM

Re: Results for 435 $109 SnG\'s
 
Mostly game selection: these occurred around jan 1, where the games were a bit tougher. I was a bit too tight on the bubble, and this was a still a statistically possible random fluctuation.

Craig


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.