Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes Shorthanded (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Standard? - small pair in SB 3/6 (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=393271)

Roy6 12-07-2005 06:51 AM

Standard? - small pair in SB 3/6
 
Both players are loose and passive.
I started questioning my play lately in this blind structure because it turns to be spewing chips very often.
I might be better off forfeiting my $1?

Party Poker 3.00/6.00 Hold'em <font color="#0000FF">(6 handed)</font> link

Preflop: Hero is SB with 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, Button calls, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, BB calls, Button calls.

Flop: (6.00 SB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
Hero checks, BB checks, Button checks.

Turn: (3.00 BB) 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises</font>, Button folds, Hero folds.

Final Pot: 6.00 BB.

MasterShakes 12-07-2005 06:59 AM

Re: Standard? - small pair in SB 3/6
 
I'm hardly experienced with the 3/6 blind structure, but I don't think raising or just completing would be bad. I think I just call her and try to flop a set. I could easily be way off though. With the preflop raise though, I think I lead on the flop and give up immediately to a raise.

imported_leader 12-07-2005 07:02 AM

Re: Standard? - small pair in SB 3/6
 
You would be better off calling PF. If you hit a set, great. If not, c/f. I would only raise this if BT was very loose and BB was tight.

Spartan1983 12-07-2005 10:51 AM

Re: Standard? - small pair in SB 3/6
 
Limp or raise I think you have to get out of that hand the 1st bet by anyone with that board.

12-07-2005 10:54 AM

Re: Standard? - small pair in SB 3/6
 
I like to limp in with small pp in SB. You won't get button to fold, maybe BB will fold but you will still have to play it out of position.

I think you should've check-folded it on the turn aswell.

POKhER 12-07-2005 11:07 AM

Re: Standard? - small pair in SB 3/6
 
Limp preflop. Check/fold flop and turn, you missed.

aargh57 12-07-2005 11:15 AM

Re: Standard? - small pair in SB 3/6
 
It's going to be tough to get people to fold on this board. You've got lot's of flush/straight possiblilities here. I think that this is the wrong time to bluff here. I don't know if you can even call it much of a semibluff as both your outs put a 3 flush on board. I think that you just got an awfull flop and turn card for your small pp and are going to have to give this one up.

aargh57 12-07-2005 11:21 AM

Re: Standard? - small pair in SB 3/6
 
I think I limp hear pf too but I don't think a raise is that bad. If BB defends too much then I think it's a clear that you should only complete but if there is a decent chance that he'll fold and get you HU with a weak player then I think it's worth it. At 3/6 the blind structure varies depending on where you play. Some sites have SB as $1 and others have SB as $1.50. I'm not sure how Party's structured.

12-07-2005 11:46 AM

Re: Standard? - small pair in SB 3/6
 
I just dont like this at all, especially at this level, its -EV for sure, call preflop, set bet....
55 has nearly no value multiway, you NEED to set it up and this doesnt happen often enough to justify your raise

zephed 12-07-2005 03:49 PM

Re: Standard? - small pair in SB 3/6
 
[ QUOTE ]
I just dont like this at all, especially at this level, its -EV for sure, call preflop, set bet....
55 has nearly no value multiway, you NEED to set it up and this doesnt happen often enough to justify your raise

[/ QUOTE ]
You don't NEED to hit a set with 55 to bet out on the flop.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.