Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes Shorthanded (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   84s in the SB.call call (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=390504)

pokerstudAA 12-03-2005 12:37 PM

84s in the SB.call call
 
Party Poker 3/6 Hold'em (6 max, 5 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

Preflop: Hero is SB with 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
UTG calls, MP calls, [color=#666666]1 fold</font>, Hero completes, BB checks.

Flop: (4 SB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [color=#0000FF](4 players)</font>
Hero checks, [color=#CC3333]BB bets</font>, UTG calls, MP calls, Hero calls.

Turn: (4 BB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [color=#0000FF](4 players)</font>
Hero checks, [color=#CC3333]BB bets</font>, UTG calls, MP calls, Hero calls.

River: (8 BB) K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] [color=#0000FF](4 players)</font>
Hero checks, [color=#CC3333]BB bets</font>, UTG calls, MP calls, Hero folds.

Final Pot: 11 BB

call call call good?

numeri 12-03-2005 12:39 PM

Re: 84s in the SB.call call
 
That's a bit loose with the 1/3 blind structure, isn't it? Seems close but OK after that.

Oh, and use 2+2 format next time. It should be "color:" instead of "color=".

pokerstudAA 12-03-2005 12:49 PM

Re: 84s in the SB.call call
 
[ QUOTE ]
Oh, and use 2+2 format next time. It should be "color:" instead of "color=".

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks. I could not figure out WTF was wrong w/ converter


You think 48s is too loose? did i mention they were soooted?

J. Stew 12-03-2005 12:52 PM

Re: 84s in the SB.call call
 
I fold the flop most of the time and overcall the river never.

Cumulonimbus 12-03-2005 12:53 PM

Re: 84s in the SB.call call
 
Why call the flop when you can bet it instead?

pokerstudAA 12-03-2005 12:57 PM

Re: 84s in the SB.call call
 
[ QUOTE ]
I fold the flop most of the time and overcall the river never.

[/ QUOTE ]

I was thinking 5 outs to trips or two pair. Probably wrong. But this board looks really dirty for that. with that board there straights, over two pair, etc..

looks like preflop was a bit loose and the flop call was junk

river fold was elementary

Spicymoose 12-03-2005 01:05 PM

Re: 84s in the SB.call call
 
[ QUOTE ]
Why call the flop when you can bet it instead?

[/ QUOTE ]

Your folding equity is not all that high. Getting raised would suck.

Spicymoose 12-03-2005 01:07 PM

Re: 84s in the SB.call call
 
Hand looks fine.

Avatar looks great.

livinitup0 12-03-2005 01:07 PM

Re: 84s in the SB.call call
 
I probably wouldn't have completed. If I did I would lead out, fold is raised, Turn I may have been a little more aggressive with, but the river is an obvious c/f.

pokerstudAA 12-03-2005 01:07 PM

Re: 84s in the SB.call call
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why call the flop when you can bet it instead?

[/ QUOTE ]

Your folding equity is not all that high. Getting raised would suck.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed. Betting into the field with that board is just asking for trouble.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.