winrate Q (i\'ve read the FAQ)
 

i know the faq says a good long-term winrate is ~8 bb/100, but i was wondering if anyone finds this sustainable at party $100 6max. assume 3-tabling.

Re: winrate Q (i\'ve read the FAQ)
 

Yes, a winrate of 8ptbb/100 is sustainable.

Re: winrate Q (i\'ve read the FAQ)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Yes, a winrate of 8ptbb/100 is sustainable.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not really. Anyone good enough to pull it off moves up before they get even close to a big enough sample size to mean anything. 8ptbb/100 LONGTERM is very tough.

Re: winrate Q (i\'ve read the FAQ)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Yes, a winrate of 8ptbb/100 is sustainable.

[/ QUOTE ]

2PTBB at NL $100 = 8PTBB at NL $25

Re: winrate Q (i\'ve read the FAQ)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, a winrate of 8ptbb/100 is sustainable.

[/ QUOTE ]

2PTBB at NL $100 = 8PTBB at NL $25

[/ QUOTE ]


???

I feel like for a $.10/$.25, max $25 buy-in game, I should average at least $4 or more for 100 hands.

Re: winrate Q (i\'ve read the FAQ)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, a winrate of 8ptbb/100 is sustainable.

[/ QUOTE ]

2PTBB at NL $100 = 8PTBB at NL $25

[/ QUOTE ]


???

I feel like for a $.10/$.25, max $25 buy-in game, I should average at least $4 or more for 100 hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

What's your question? You only need to win at 25% of your NL$25 rate at NL $100 to show the same profit. Assume my PTBB at NL $100 is 5, I am making the equivalent of 20PTBB at NL $25. Why sustain 8PTBB at NL $25, when sustaining 3 PTBB at NL $100 is more profitable?

Re: winrate Q (i\'ve read the FAQ)
 

But the OP did ask about TPBB/100 at NL100 not NL25.

Re: winrate Q (i\'ve read the FAQ)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, a winrate of 8ptbb/100 is sustainable.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not really. Anyone good enough to pull it off moves up before they get even close to a big enough sample size to mean anything. 8ptbb/100 LONGTERM is very tough.

[/ QUOTE ]

Okay, so you are saying it is possible to sustain the given win rate at this level. Of course, the better players are going to move up. But, if one were to choose to stay at 100NL they could sustain this winrate.

Re: winrate Q (i\'ve read the FAQ)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, a winrate of 8ptbb/100 is sustainable.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not really. Anyone good enough to pull it off moves up before they get even close to a big enough sample size to mean anything. 8ptbb/100 LONGTERM is very tough.

[/ QUOTE ]

A little bit off topic here. Is there any qualitative difference between 100 and higher limit?

Lets assume someone has 8ptbb/100 at 100NL level, what's his expectaion at 200, 400?

Re: winrate Q (i\'ve read the FAQ)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, a winrate of 8ptbb/100 is sustainable.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not really. Anyone good enough to pull it off moves up before they get even close to a big enough sample size to mean anything. 8ptbb/100 LONGTERM is very tough.

[/ QUOTE ]

A little bit off topic here. Is there any qualitative difference between 100 and higher limit?

Lets assume someone has 8ptbb/100 at 100NL level, what's his expectaion at 200, 400?

[/ QUOTE ]

My winrate at NL $100 and $200 is within .5 PTBB after 50k and 25k hands, respectively. My expectation is not to see an increase in my win rate as I move up. I would much rather try to maintain my current win rate. Maintaining your current NL$100 win rate at NL $400 means you are making 4 times your NL $100 earn. That's much more realistic goal as to what is attainable than shooting for a magic number.