Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Medium-Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=54)
-   -   A question about smaller pairs (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=402652)

Tropex 12-21-2005 07:00 AM

A question about smaller pairs
 
I'm just recently moving up to the first midstakes (\o/) And I was kinda wonderin'... It has been pretty easy to make constant profit up to NL100, so here's my question about the not so high pairs. Ranging from, well 22 to 99 or TT...

So let's say you're in BB and CO or Button makes it 4 BB. Will you call the extra 3 BB every day, every night, even if you assume you're behind against a bigger pair in hopes to hit a set. You get huge payments for sets in the lower limits, but I'm not 100% sure whether it's worth it. And what if you're on button (ie. in position, are you willing to call the 4 BB)?

Obviously the implied odds go down as the stakes go up as people are capable of making better laydowns.

xorbie 12-21-2005 07:06 AM

Re: A question about smaller pairs
 
i re-raise 88 and down here frequently, rarely raise 99-JJ thought (better to see cheap showdown i think, could be wrong though). against a villain who is agressive pre and postflop, i think with 22-77 it goes like so:

raise > fold > call.

Tropex 12-21-2005 07:08 AM

Re: A question about smaller pairs
 
Reraising small pairs, eh. To gain deceptive value so you can steal pots on dangerous flops?

xorbie 12-21-2005 07:11 AM

Re: A question about smaller pairs
 
to make villain fold, to make him not want to steal from me in the future and because small pairs are easy as hell to play postflop (although i 90% of the time continue on the flop).

cardsharkk04 12-21-2005 07:24 AM

Re: A question about smaller pairs
 
It seems like when I do this the villain calls a lot, and then I'm usually putting out a large continuation bet into a scary board/overcards with my small pair just praying not to get called. Didn't like it too much.

emil3000 12-21-2005 07:50 AM

Re: A question about smaller pairs
 
[ QUOTE ]
It seems like when I do this the villain calls a lot, and then I'm usually putting out a large continuation bet into a scary board/overcards with my small pair just praying not to get called. Didn't like it too much.

[/ QUOTE ]

I love reraising preflop. Success rate of my continuation bets is sick high, and you take it down a lot too.

xorbie 12-21-2005 08:15 AM

Re: A question about smaller pairs
 
[ QUOTE ]
It seems like when I do this the villain calls a lot, and then I'm usually putting out a large continuation bet into a scary board/overcards with my small pair just praying not to get called. Didn't like it too much.

[/ QUOTE ]

dont do it unless villain is stealing often, in which case you should be getting called on the flop significantly less than 1/3 of the time unless villain is calling with any pair any draw.

jacknine 12-21-2005 11:12 AM

Re: A question about smaller pairs
 
This is what I like to do - though I doubt anybody would agree with it.
Out of position - I like to raise with the small pairs pre-flop, since this will give me a chance of stealing it by being the first to bet on a <=J-high flop.
In position, I'm more likely to just call and only play from the flop onwards if I hit that set.

I admire those who reraise with a small pair in late position. I'm curious what you guys do when you miss the flop and someone bets into you?

12-21-2005 11:19 AM

Re: A question about smaller pairs
 
It sounds like most of you are talking about defending blinds, and I wanted to say something about the implied odds. I don't think implied odds are much worse at mid-stakes. If the villian has an overpair (AA/KK/QQ especially), raised from a steal position, and you flop a set, I think you will make a lot of money. The problem is, most of the time, the villain won't have a big pair. So if you flop a set, you might not be paid off because villain doesn't have a big pair, or you don't flop a set, and the villain may not have a pair, but this is a tough decision to be in.

I guess what I'm saying, is the implied odds to hit a set are still usually there if you can put villain on a big pair, and then you shouldn't raise preflop. Try and hit the set and get paid off. But if villain is likely stealing, reraise preflop so you won't be in such a tough position after the flop, and to stop him from stealing.

Bukem_ 12-21-2005 12:03 PM

Re: A question about smaller pairs
 
[ QUOTE ]


So let's say you're in BB and CO or Button makes it 4 BB. Will you call the extra 3 BB every day, every night, even if you assume you're behind against a bigger pair in hopes to hit a set.

[/ QUOTE ]

You are rarely up against a top hand, and usually won't get paid if you do hit your set. Its not a good idea to set mine vs a co/button steal.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.