Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=17)
-   -   Against a Maniac (Two Hands) (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=385926)

lehighguy 11-27-2005 12:48 AM

Against a Maniac (Two Hands)
 
I'm playing against a maniac. He huffs and bluffs ALOT. But he does fold sometimes if he is convinced he is beat. Nevertheless, total maniac. I don't have stats, but to give you an idea:

VPIP: 75%
PFR: 40%

He's all in alot. The following are two hands I had questions about.

BB = $6
Hero Stack Covers
Villian (maniac) $800

Hand 1:
Hero has KK in CO

Hero raises to $30, villian (button) calls, SB calls, BB calls

Flop: J,9,9 rainbow
check, check, hero bets $110, villian raises all-in, fold, fold, hero ???

Hand 2:
Hero has ATo on button.
Hero open raises to $36, fold, villian BB calls.

Flop: J, 5, 2 rainbow.
villian check, hero bets $70, villian calls.

Turn: T
Hero bets $200, villian goes all-in, hero ???

diconoclastx 11-27-2005 12:52 AM

Re: Against a Maniac (Two Hands)
 
Hand 1 I call.
Hand 2 I fold.

surfinillini 11-27-2005 12:55 AM

Re: Against a Maniac (Two Hands)
 
[ QUOTE ]
Hand 1 I call.
Hand 2 I fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hand 1 call

Hand 2 - call if you won hand 1

lehighguy 11-27-2005 01:08 AM

Re: Against a Maniac (Two Hands)
 
I found both of these very diffucult. The fact that he went all in with two behind really freaked me out. He isn't going all-in every hand, but is doing it alot. I can totally see him showing me 95o or something.

I was working under the premise that I was either really behind or slightly ahead.

adanthar 11-27-2005 01:55 AM

Re: Against a Maniac (Two Hands)
 
[ QUOTE ]
I was working under the premise that I was either really behind or slightly ahead.

[/ QUOTE ]

Vs. a maniac on a J99r board, you might be really behind, but you are just about never exactly slightly ahead.

montechristo 11-27-2005 05:08 AM

Re: Against a Maniac (Two Hands)
 
i think we need more info about the maniac... does he overvalue top pair, etc? I would call hand 1, he either has a 9 or you have him crushed. Hand 2 looks like a fold- only thing you are beating is air or worse ten. since you open raised from the button though, very possible you have the best hand, he has air and thinks you have AK or something. tough but I think you should fold.

creedofhubris 11-27-2005 05:34 AM

Re: Against a Maniac (Two Hands)
 
Hand 1 is an easy call, hand 2 is not.

Garland 11-27-2005 05:53 AM

Re: Against a Maniac (Two Hands)
 
Hand #1 is an easy call. Expect to see anything from a lone J to something like QT or T8 or maybe even another pocket pair. If he has a 9, so be it, pay him off and stack him later.

Hand #2: Due to his maniac tendancies, I would seriously consider checking the turn behind and induce him to bluff on the river. As played, I would fold.

Garland

gomberg 11-27-2005 05:58 AM

Re: Against a Maniac (Two Hands)
 
Yeah, Hand 1 is a call.

Hand 2, you NEED to check behind that turn - what's the point of that bet?

FromTheSouth 11-27-2005 12:09 PM

Re: Against a Maniac (Two Hands)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hand 1 I call.
Hand 2 I fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hand 1 call

Hand 2 - call if you won hand 1

[/ QUOTE ]


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.