Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   One-table Tournaments (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   Post deleted by Mat Sklansky (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=339094)

09-17-2005 09:44 PM

Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
 

raptor517 09-17-2005 10:06 PM

Re: Bankroll for 5.25 heads up matches on stars?
 
only prolly need like 50 bucks, should be fine if yer good at all.. holla

09-17-2005 10:19 PM

Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
 

raptor517 09-17-2005 10:26 PM

Re: Bankroll for 5.25 heads up matches on stars?
 
[ QUOTE ]
kthx mike jones

[/ QUOTE ]

who? holla

Shilly 09-17-2005 10:31 PM

Re: Bankroll for 5.25 heads up matches on stars?
 
TWO EIGHT ONE, THREE THREE OH, EIGHT ZERO ZERO FOU!

valenzuela 09-17-2005 11:34 PM

Re: Bankroll for 5.25 heads up matches on stars?
 
Im guessing "mike jones" is the OP name

DaveKForty7 09-18-2005 12:23 AM

Re: Bankroll for 5.25 heads up matches on stars?
 
Mike Jones. Who? Mike Jones. I said. Mike Jones.

09-18-2005 01:01 AM

Re: Bankroll for 5.25 heads up matches on stars?
 
$50's probably fine.

Just FYI, I like these games a lot. I screwed around with them for a little bit. The players are horrible, and they're fun to play because they're so incredibly player dependent. In 300 I had a 30% ROI (small sample, I know, but I think it's very doable longterm), so they're nice to play and the $/table-hour is much bigger than for 10-person $5.50s. You can't multitable though, so they're not nearly as profitable.

09-18-2005 01:06 AM

Re: Bankroll for 5.25 heads up matches on stars?
 
[ QUOTE ]
$50's probably fine.

Just FYI, I like these games a lot. I screwed around with them for a little bit. The players are horrible, and they're fun to play because they're so incredibly player dependent. In 300 I had a 30% ROI (small sample, I know, but I think it's very doable longterm), so they're nice to play and the $/table-hour is much bigger than for 10-person $5.50s. You can't multitable though, so they're not nearly as profitable.

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually, 300 games is probably quite a nice sample size for HU matches.

09-18-2005 01:15 AM

Re: Bankroll for 5.25 heads up matches on stars?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
$50's probably fine.

Just FYI, I like these games a lot. I screwed around with them for a little bit. The players are horrible, and they're fun to play because they're so incredibly player dependent. In 300 I had a 30% ROI (small sample, I know, but I think it's very doable longterm), so they're nice to play and the $/table-hour is much bigger than for 10-person $5.50s. You can't multitable though, so they're not nearly as profitable.

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually, 300 games is probably quite a nice sample size for HU matches.

[/ QUOTE ]

Meh. I've been doing way too much math on these boards today, so I'm not gonna attempt to prove/disprove what you just said. Maybe you're right; I'm just under the assumption that sample sizes are almost always too small [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]. I do know that after ~150 games my ROI was like 15%; so that suggests that there's still significant variance at this scale.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.