Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   One-table Tournaments (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   $33 5-handed QQ laydown (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=366998)

10-27-2005 11:49 PM

$33 5-handed QQ laydown
 
Both competent players, neither particularly tight or loose (approx 20% flops).

***** Hand History for Game 2941810236 *****
NL Texas Hold'em $30 Buy-in + $3 Entry Fee
Level:3 Blinds(25/50)
Table Table 66881 (Real Money)
Seat 4 is the button
Total number of players : 5
Seat 1: HERO ( $1545 )
Seat 3: scman201 ( $1795 )
Seat 4: steelers57 ( $250 )
Seat 5: sk0oby21 ( $845 )
Seat 9: warranty1 ( $3565 )
Trny:16933825 Level:3
Blinds(25/50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to HERO [ Qh Qs ]
HERO raises [175].
scman201 is all-In [1795]
steelers57 is all-In [250]
sk0oby21 folds.
warranty1 folds.
HERO folds.


Weak tight? Stack sizes were a big thing.

jeffraider 10-27-2005 11:52 PM

Re: $33 5-handed QQ laydown
 
I think this is probably a pretty easy call, especially with the shorty's money in there too.

10-27-2005 11:56 PM

Re: $33 5-handed QQ laydown
 
What do you think about sk0oby21 -- I know the pure ICM solution is a clear call.

jeffraider 10-28-2005 12:12 AM

Re: $33 5-handed QQ laydown
 
[ QUOTE ]
What do you think about sk0oby21 -- I know the pure ICM solution is a clear call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well seeing that he folded preflop and I don't know his hole cards, I think he's probably a really nice guy who enjoys long walks on the beach, baseball, and loves pets.

mike28 10-28-2005 12:28 AM

Re: $33 5-handed QQ laydown
 
call instantly

As long as scman isn't solid he's reraising a lot less for value.

jgunnip 10-28-2005 01:03 AM

Re: $33 5-handed QQ laydown
 
I don't like it. You'll run into a lower PP so much more often than AK, AA, and KK that you're losing out on a lot of chips by folding.

adanthar 10-28-2005 01:05 AM

Re: $33 5-handed QQ laydown
 
Stack sizes are nearly irrelevant (in the way you are thinking of) when the short stack has 17 BB. Call.

kyro 10-28-2005 01:07 AM

Re: $33 5-handed QQ laydown
 
[ QUOTE ]
Stack sizes are nearly irrelevant (in the way you are thinking of) when the short stack has 17 BB. Call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Listen to Adanthar. I hear he knows what he is talking about.

10-28-2005 01:19 AM

Re: $33 5-handed QQ laydown
 
When you word it that way--17BB--I feel kinda dumb laying down :-)

jeffraider 10-28-2005 01:21 AM

Re: $33 5-handed QQ laydown
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Stack sizes are nearly irrelevant (in the way you are thinking of) when the short stack has 17 BB. Call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Listen to Adanthar. I hear he knows what he is talking about.

[/ QUOTE ]

His name is no longer blue so he's probably turned donkey in the last day or so! Fold!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.