Re: MLG: Evolving
 

Fair enough. Book me for Newt -3.

Re: MLG: Evolving
 

SNGs require no skill, why is this question being asked in this forum? You really dont need to go past 3.5 in party sngs. There is some meta in PS 1ks and whatnot, but that doesnt apply to 99.99% of this forum.

Re: MLG: Evolving
 

I voted 4 because I *should* know what I'm doing (pro), but I really multitable heavily to make up for my lack of natural talent, so I'm probally a 2.

Re: MLG: Evolving
 

im a 2 , sometimes a 3, most likely a 2. Im like 1300 dollars up though..so thats y i voted 3 since thats the most objective part of the description.

Re: MLG: Evolving
 

What?! 66 votes and no newbs? I'm amazed [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

Re: MLG: Evolving
 

I voted 3 but I think I am a 4. I just don't want to get cocky and start FPS donking.

Re: MLG: Evolving
 

[ QUOTE ]
SNGs require no skill

[/ QUOTE ]

As opposed to the bulk of online MTTs, where a very significant portion of the event is going to be spent in the same huge blinds to average stack regime? You're clearly right that the highest levels don't really apply to SNGs, but I don't think they apply to 99% of the tournament poker that anybody here plays either. Congratulations on the self-importance, though.

EDIT: Also, why is everybody in such a hurry to categorize themselves? Does putting yourself in a neatly labeled box really help you conceive of what you should be doing to change how you play/think about poker?

Re: MLG: Evolving
 

Newbs haven't figured out how to vote.

Re: MLG: Evolving
 

hmmm.....good point

Re: MLG: Evolving
 

[ QUOTE ]

Seriously though I recognize a bit of my level in most of the Steps.

[/ QUOTE ]

ditto, except for the "meta" level.