Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   spitting midhigh (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=379191)

Ulysses 11-15-2005 10:25 PM

Re: spitting midhigh
 
I think the more appropriate split is online/casino. However, I think the real problem is not limits, it is quality of posts. This is an espcially big problem w/ the online posts, where there are people playing mid-high yet still making boring, almost beginner-level, posts. Perhaps splitting up the forums as mid and high would help this out a little. Dunno.

astroglide 11-15-2005 10:35 PM

Re: spitting midhigh
 
i don't want 15/30 here either, but it's because those hands rate to be waste-of-space hand history dumps.

how many of you would be upset with a well-crafted hand from a 20/40 casino session, and think that it had no place here? i would welcome it, and it's not because of the limit.

bobby's point about suggestion 1 not being a "total split" is a good one. but if people don't want to see the posts simply because they suck, aren't we spanking the wrong baby by simply separating the limits more?

mmcd 11-15-2005 10:39 PM

Re: spitting midhigh
 
I don't see any reason for a split. I can generally recognize which posts are probably going to suck based on title/poster, and I just don't read them. I don't think this forum is so cluttered as to make a split necessary.

TStoneMBD 11-15-2005 10:40 PM

Re: spitting midhigh
 
i personally could care less about a well crafted 20/40 hand that was written with grace and style and has a tommy angelo cool stamp at the top of the thread. i post hands that i think might have been played suboptimally that i could learn from with the help of others. if these concepts are beginner concepts to you guys thats unfortunate because im posting them here.

stoxtrader 11-15-2005 10:44 PM

Re: spitting midhigh
 
split the HU and short handed forum first maybe even into 3 or 4 forums, goodness knows it needs it like, 10X more.

not too many of the higher limits go full much anyways.

bobbyi 11-15-2005 10:51 PM

Re: spitting midhigh
 
[ QUOTE ]
split the HU and short handed forum first maybe even into 3 or 4 forums, goodness knows it needs it like, 10X more.

[/ QUOTE ]
Splitting HUSH is happening no matter what.

Dave Mac 11-15-2005 11:18 PM

Re: spitting midhigh
 
I agree the forum is almost always unreadable, and redundant. All of the party hands seem the same. I think one of the issues is beyond the basic most speicific hands will not teach much and are generally irrelevent. should i 3 bet this river, well maybe, but no specific issue, after those basic corrections is really going to improve our game that much or are that interesting. some post do change our game or perspecitive, but i find these very few and very far between. we all bsically know how to play, and i have found improving the small things to get to perfect or making them better is very hard, and so situation and player dependet it is very hard to learn is describe or understand in a post.
dave

Klepton 11-15-2005 11:35 PM

Re: spitting midhigh
 
meh.

i think the high limit forum will start to become a brag central forum.

and then the mid forum will probably be tumbleweeds.

astroglide 11-15-2005 11:36 PM

Re: spitting midhigh
 
i was referring to the value of the post/hand, not a rating of its prose

mrkilla 11-15-2005 11:38 PM

Re: spitting midhigh
 
I'd be for splitting into a Mid/Hi B+M and Mid/Hi Online. It comes down to how many party "What do I do with Ace's" 15/30 posts a month get here.
B+M 15/30 plays diffrent then online, heck half the posts say "Well if this was online I'd call down but B+M I am folding"


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.