Re: strange hand against mike l. 20/40
 

[ QUOTE ]
when playing against a 2+2er/TAG like mike l.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe it's a brain cramp. Maybe it's a typo, but I seriously don't know how you can type "T" instead of an "L". It's like 5 keys away...

Garland

Re: strange hand against mike l. 20/40
 

"I seriously don't know how you can type "T" instead of an "L"."

come down here and find out

Re: strange hand against mike l. 20/40
 

[ QUOTE ]
come down here and find out

[/ QUOTE ]

Ironic. I'll actually be in LA for 6 days in a week. Maybe I have to see the man, the myth, the legend himself... Maybe mikel can finally say he's progressed to zee's fourth stage...[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Garland

Re: sults
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Mike folded AT, and MP2 rolled AQ. The 2+2ers lost the minimum, and the fish won the minimum. Nice hands? Uh...

[/ QUOTE ]

That doesn't mean you played it well.

[/ QUOTE ]
holla

Re: strange hand against mike l. 20/40
 

"Maybe mikel can finally say he's progressed to zee's fourth stage..."

dude i progressed to some stage that zee wont write about. it's a new stage and it has no number. we call it "ultraexpert".

but yeah throw me a pm when youre around.

Re: sults
 

he played the hand perfectly. it was a nice nuanced hand that involved playing the players and their hand range correctly. normally KK is a bet on this flop. but in this special case it was not.

i also played the hand expertly.

Re: strange hand against mike l. 20/40
 

[ QUOTE ]

dude i progressed to some stage that zee wont write about. it's a new stage and it has no number. we call it "ultraexpert".

[/ QUOTE ]

You might want to change your profile then. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

[ QUOTE ]
but yeah throw me a pm when youre around.

[/ QUOTE ]

Will do...

Garland

Re: sults
 

[ QUOTE ]
it was a nice nuanced hand that involved playing the players and their hand range correctly.


[/ QUOTE ]
I think that's what all hands are about.


[ QUOTE ]
normally KK is a bet on this flop. but in this special case it was not.

[/ QUOTE ]
Just because you say it doesn't make it true.