A non-pair hand - Part 2.
 

This table had just gotten short a few hands ago. I don't have enough hands (40) to make the villain's numbers hold up in court, but he seemed tightish and aggressive-ish. I don't know if he knows what he's doing short-handed.

Party Poker 20/40 Hold'em (5 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

Preflop: Hero is UTG with K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
<font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, SB calls, BB calls.

Flop: (6 SB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
SB checks, BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, SB calls, BB calls.

Turn: (4.50 BB) A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
SB checks, BB checks, Hero checks (?).

River: (4.50 BB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">SB bets</font>, BB folds, Hero calls.

Final Pot: 6.50 BB

Re: A non-pair hand - Part 2.
 

I would check the turn and fold the river. You got called in two spots on the flop, it's unlikely that both players are drawing.

Lost Wages

Re: A non-pair hand - Part 2.
 

True, but the river counterfeited a number of his possible holdings yes?

- Jim

Re: A non-pair hand - Part 2.
 

Good point, I missed that. So you intended to fold most rivers?

Lost Wages

Re: A non-pair hand - Part 2.
 

Absolutely. This river came and I thought about it for a little while then made the call.

- Jim

Re: A non-pair hand - Part 2.
 

I like the call on this river. Nice hand.