Bonuses may not be that bad for the Sites
 

When I look at my data in PokerTracker, I see information on the rake in two places. On the "Game Notes" tab, I see how much rake was taken from all of the games in which I was dealt cards. Here it does not matter if I won/lost the hand or if I contributed any money. On the "General Info" tab, I see how much rake was withheld specifically from the hands that I won.

Over the last five days playing $1/$2 on Party to work on clearing bonuses, I have played 3370 hands. From the "Game Notes" page, I see the total rake withheld was $782 and the average players per hand (APH) was 9.24 which results in $84.63 being the rake that Party attributes to me for purposes of rakeback MGR as I understand it. However, looking on the "General Info" tab, I see that $182 was taken in rake from the hands that I won.

So if I'm reading this right, it means Party made about $100 from me in rake that it doesn't consider for rakeback purposes for my affiliate and me. I realize that other people playing may not actually generate as much rake as is attributed to them (think of the guy playing 90% of the hands but only winning a few times) but still ....

Re: Bonuses may not be that bad for the Sites
 

I hope they are good for the sites so they keep doing them

Re: Bonuses may not be that bad for the Sites
 

you're running really good and your sample size is way too small.

the guy that plays 90% of his hands pays more rake than someone that plays well.

Re: Bonuses may not be that bad for the Sites
 

Talk to your affiliate you understand rake back wrongly, and iff you don't have an affiliate click the 'classifieds' link at the top left...