3/6 vs 2/4
 

Guys I just cant seem to make the adjustments.

I kill 2/4 but everytime I try to go to 3/6....i lose.

I already play tight out of the small blind(most would say to tight).

SFWUSC

Re: 3/6 vs 2/4
 

maybe killed is to strong.

I dont win as much. The difference between them is like 1.5BB per 100.... but sample size at 3/6 is crap....maybe 10K hands.

SFWUSC

Re: 3/6 vs 2/4
 

[ QUOTE ]
maybe killed is to strong.

I dont win as much. The difference between them is like 1.5BB per 100.... but sample size at 3/6 is crap....maybe 10K hands.

SFWUSC

[/ QUOTE ]

My first 15K at 3/6 I was at 3.5bb/100. The next 25K I was -0.5bb/100. 10K is nothing.

Re: 3/6 vs 2/4
 

10K is nothing. 2/4 is a softer, more passive game, but you would do well to stick with 3/6 and learn to beat it. It's not that difficult and it is a necessary stepping stone. Keep with it man, you'll get it.

Re: 3/6 vs 2/4
 

I don't think you should just play one or the other. Play both interchangably. Use your table selection skills across two limits.