Who are the winners here?
 

We all see the big names on TV (Lederer, Brunson, Ivey, Harman, Negreanu, etc) who are always playing each other in these huge cash games. If they are all winning players, who the heck is losing?

Re: Who are the winners here?
 

Similar Topic already taking place

Re: Who are the winners here?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Similar Topic already taking place

[/ QUOTE ]

And apparently it's obvious that you should have looked in a forum called "Texas Hold'em", even though most of the big games are in fact not hold'em but mixed games. Right?

Re: Who are the winners here?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Similar Topic already taking place

[/ QUOTE ]

And apparently it's obvious that you should have looked in a forum called "Texas Hold'em", even though most of the big games are in fact not hold'em but mixed games. Right?

[/ QUOTE ]

Funny, I thought all mixed games were a form of poker...kinda why I put it under poker theory

Re: Who are the winners here?
 

Think about it. If you still can't figure it out, your seat is now available.

Re: Who are the winners here?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Funny, I thought all mixed games were a form of poker...kinda why I put it under poker theory

[/ QUOTE ]

Solami, although I sarcastically addressed my reply to the generic "you", it was really a dig at RTN. I should have said, "It's obvious he should have looked..." Some people just add replies willy-nilly, so that you can't tell from the "Reply to" field who they meant to reply to. I try to reply to the person whose comment I'm actually responding to, although at times I get lazy and add it at the bottom of the thread.

My inference from the comment with the link was that he or she thought you should have searched the Texas Hold'em forum to find that thread. I have no idea why anyone would think that, hence my sloppy reply. If I were a better writer, it would be clear that I was pushing back against the notion that someone should have found that thread in another forum rather than posting a new thread here.

As usual, "no good deed goes unpunished." Or maybe I just need to write more clearly. *shrug*

Re: Who are the winners here?
 

I was sloppy too, my apologies... Should have worded that link a little better, just meant it as a friendly link to more information on the topic you were interested in.

Sorry that it appears to imply that you should have not posted here or known to look there :{

Re: Who are the winners here?
 

phil helmuth

Re: Who are the winners here?
 

[ QUOTE ]
phil helmuth

[/ QUOTE ]

baahahaha

POTY

Re: Who are the winners here?
 

Its understandable...no problem