Re: STL at Ind
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[censored] [censored] [censored]

[/ QUOTE ]
[censored]
[censored]
[censored]
[censored]
fuckc
vdsajfis;flkasjfsadfdas

[/ QUOTE ]

Wait, you mean you bet on STL to Cover? Are you serious?

Re: STL at Ind
 

[censored] me sideways

Re: STL at Ind
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[censored] [censored] [censored]

[/ QUOTE ]
[censored]
[censored]
[censored]
[censored]
fuckc
vdsajfis;flkasjfsadfdas

[/ QUOTE ]

Wait, you mean you bet on STL to Cover? Are you serious?

[/ QUOTE ]

I hope you aren't serious in questioning my seriousness.

Re: STL at Ind
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[censored] [censored] [censored]

[/ QUOTE ]
[censored]
[censored]
[censored]
[censored]
fuckc
vdsajfis;flkasjfsadfdas

[/ QUOTE ]

Wait, you mean you bet on STL to Cover? Are you serious?

[/ QUOTE ]

I hope you aren't serious in questioning my seriousness.

[/ QUOTE ]

Must be coming from a football fan, not a bettor.

Re: STL at Ind
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[censored] [censored] [censored]

[/ QUOTE ]
[censored]
[censored]
[censored]
[censored]
fuckc
vdsajfis;flkasjfsadfdas

[/ QUOTE ]

Wait, you mean you bet on STL to Cover? Are you serious?

[/ QUOTE ]

I hope you aren't serious in questioning my seriousness.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe it's 'cause I hate the Rams, but I didn't think this was a clear bet either way. Still, if I had to chose, I think the Colts are more than 14 points better than the Rams.

Re: STL at Ind
 

[censored] die martin die die

Re: STL at Ind
 

[ QUOTE ]
[censored] me sideways

[/ QUOTE ]

wow.. i mean just wow...

Re: STL at Ind
 

the colts couldn't beat the spread against anybody except alex [censored] smith's int machine no talent ass.

[censored] [censored]

Re: STL at Ind
 

everyone loves the Colts, and hates the Rams.

This looks stupid now, but the "sharps" saw this either as a no play or bet on the Rams (particularly if you get +14). Definitely not a bet on the Colts.

Re: STL at Ind
 

football is gay.