Question to David Sklansky re. Something You Said About IQ/Poker
 

Mr. Sklansky:

I thought it might be useful to ask you this by separate post.

You recently said about some top level players: "[t]heir greatest asset is in fact that they are very smart. The average IQ of the players in the 4000-8000 game is well above 140."

You believe there is a high correlation between IQ and poker ability, one that you describe as the "greatest asset" of at least two (and presumably many more) top level players. I do not doubt this, but I have two very specific questions to pose to you:

1) How do you know that "[t]he average IQ of the players in the 4000-8000 game is well above 140?"

2) Is it possible, in your opinion, for a player in the range of 115-125 or so to be a top level or world-class poker player?

Thank you very much for reading this post and for your anticipated response. I appreciate it.

Re: Question to David Sklansky re. Something You Said About IQ/Poker
 

He knows because of their scores on the HLPPAT (High Limit Poker Players Admissions Test), for which an acceptable score correlates to at least an IQ of 140. Obviously, all of the players had to pass in order to even be sitting down at the 4k/8k game.

Re: Question to David Sklansky re. Something You Said About IQ/Poker
 

A player with a 140+ IQ would know the answer
intuitively. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

Re: Question to David Sklansky re. Something You Said About IQ/Poker
 

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Svar till:</font><hr />
A player with a 140+ IQ would know the answer
intuitively. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Guess my 134 isnt good then [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]. ohhh yeah, i forgot i dont really have the bankroll to play in a 4000/8000 dollar game [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Re: Question to David Sklansky re. Something You Said About IQ/Poker
 

Being smart, in regards to poker success is like being very fast or very strong regarding being a good linebacker. The smarter you are the greater your chances for success.

The reason why this is not well recognized is because:

A. Most really smart people are not that good at poker

B. Most excellent poker players are not really smart.


Some, (not so smart) people think that A and B combined imply that being really smart is of no great value to being a poker player. I often see both points made on these and other forums. Hopefully you see the fallacious reasoning.

Re: Question to David Sklansky re. Something You Said About IQ/Poker
 

[ QUOTE ]
A. Most really smart people are not that good at poker

B. Most excellent poker players are not really smart

[/ QUOTE ]

Talk about a fallacious statement. Or is that facetious? Does anyone see anything wrong with David's pictorial here? "Most really smart people are not really good at poker". Well, now what does that mean? It certainly doesn't mean that most smart people are not capable at being good at poker. Does it? Of course not. What it probably means is that most smart people are too smart to waste their time learning to be good at poker. Not being smart myself, I am just guessing. Just guessing is what "not smart" people do.

If David's second statement is correct "Most excellenat poker players are not really smart" one must then consider just what it takes to be an excellent poker player. According to Sklansky "brains" are not a prerequisite. All I can say to that is "Thank God". I think I've picked a game that suits my ability or inaability as the case may be. Thanks to David I feel like I have a chance to succeed at this "not so smart people's" game!
[img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Vince

Re: Question to David Sklansky re. Something You Said About IQ/Poker
 

[ QUOTE ]
A player with a 140+ IQ would know the answer
intuitively. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

You forgot to say "Do you see why?"

Re: Question to David Sklansky re. Something You Said About IQ/Poker
 

The way I read it is as follows:

Let's say you have 100 random people. Perhaps 1 of them has what it takes to be a great poker player. Now, let's take a group of 100 people with high IQ's -- whatever the number is, it's at least 2 (i.e. more) have the chance to be a great poker player.

Most people aren't smart.
Most people aren't good poker players.

HOWEVER, as in most things in life, being intelligent increases your chances of excellence.

THAT is his point, I believe, not that all great poker players are smart/not smart or that all smart people will automatically make great poker players.

My apologies to David if I completely butchered his point.

Barron Vangor Toth
www.BarronVangorToth.com

Re: Question to David Sklansky re. Something You Said About IQ/Poker
 

[ QUOTE ]
My apologies to David if I completely butchered his point

[/ QUOTE ]

Well if you completely butchered his point can we assume that you are not smart enough to play poker?

Vince

Re: Question to David Sklansky re. Something You Said About IQ/Poker
 

and "It Depends"