Overplayed ugly full house?
 

Sorry for the poor editing, still can't get a converter to work.


NL Texas Hold'em $50 Buy-in + $5 Entry Fee Level:1 Blinds(10/15)
Seat 6 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: 1( $1000 )
Seat 2: 2( $1215 )
Seat 3: 3 ( $1000 )
Seat 4: 4( $1680 )
Seat 5: 5( $960 )
Seat 6: 6( $945 )
Seat 7: 7( $480 )
Seat 8: 8( $810 )
Seat 9: Hero ( $1000 )
Seat 10: 9( $910 )
Trny:14660729 Level:1
Blinds(10/15)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Hero [ 8c 8s ]
Hero calls [15].
1 folds.
xx calls [15].
4 folds.
xx calls [15].
xx calls [5].
xx checks.
** Dealing Flop ** [ 9c, 9h, 9d ]
xx checks.
xx checks.
Hero bets [55].
xx folds.
xx raises [150].
2 folds
Hero is all-In [930]

Re: Overplayed ugly full house?
 

Perhaps it is a pure bluff trying to scare you off. I think he has something though. It would take big cojones to bluff raise on a flop like this with five people seeing the flop.

So in short, I fold to the raise here.

Re: Overplayed ugly full house?
 

Since it looks like I'm not going to get other replies, I'll explain my reasoning. A 9 just calls here, and the PPs that beat me (TT+) will most likely have raised preflop. I think my opponent has either Ax, which will probably fold, or a lower PP than mine, which may call.

This doesn't really have anything to do with my argument, but he called with 33. Heh.