Re: Question in Ciaffone\'s PL and NL book
 

You were supposed to leave after the first last post. Coming back for a second swipe just makes you look petty.

Re: Question in Ciaffone\'s PL and NL book
 

[ QUOTE ]

I like theory. And I like masturbation. Why not put the two together?

[/ QUOTE ]

QOTD

Re: Question in Ciaffone\'s PL and NL book
 

[ QUOTE ]

just a piece of advice, next time you REALLY want to learn something about this great book, dont respond so forcefully when someone reinforces your preconcieved notions, let the discussion grow naturally, this thread closely resembles a dialogue of theoretical masturbation

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

it would be a vast overstatement to say you understand the basic concepts in the text

[/ QUOTE ]

And from my flush thread:
[ QUOTE ]
as much as i dislike your treatment of people who pointed out that AA is in fact a set in this hand, and other assorted issues i have with your posting

[/ QUOTE ]

Not only are you a jackass, but apparently you're a hypocritical jackass. Attacking chaostracize for no apparent reason with very personal comments about his intelligence when he hasn't been out of line is lame as hell. Maybe you're not a hypocrite though, and I should have interpreted your "issues" you had with my posts as being that I wasn't as hostile as you would prefer.