Standing on principles
Kay Bailey Hutchinson (R) of Texas:
[ QUOTE ] And secondly, I certainly hope that if there is going to be an indictment that says something happened, that it is an indictment on a crime and not some perjury technicality where they couldn't indict on the crime and so they go to something just to show that their two years of investigation was not a waste of time and taxpayer dollars. [/ QUOTE ] Could it be that she said this some 8 odd years ago? Or was it this week? |
Re: Standing on principles
Sounds like she's talking about Martha Stewart.
|
Re: Standing on principles
Hmmm, I thought this was going to be a thread about rowdy schoolchildren. Disappointing. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
Re: Standing on principles
Isn't perjury a crime? Am I missing something?
|
Re: Standing on principles
I don't know about you but I think blantant perjury is a pretty big crime for a public official no matter who it is.
-Gryph |
Re: Standing on principles
[ QUOTE ]
I don't know about you but I think blantant perjury is a pretty big crime for a public official no matter who it is. -Gryph [/ QUOTE ] Wull, uh, now, doehn thay-yut duh-pend on whut-chur definishun of "izz" izz? [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] |
Re: Standing on principles
I was quoting Kay Bailey.
Perjury is a crime if the alleged perjurer is of the other party. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.