Was This Website Designed By A 2-Year Old?
 

No offense is meant (well, not too much offense) but this website seems poorly designed.

I'm not advocating using Flash intros and all that crap, but the site could certainly use some redesigning and cleaning up.

I'm no HTML genius, but I figure there are plenty of 15-year old kids out there that Sklansky could pay a couple hundred bucks to do a nice design for the site. What do you think?

Re: bump (nt)
 

nt

Re: Was This Website Designed By A 2-Year Old?
 

The site design is not bad, merely simple. It is conducive to reading the posts instead of having lots of extraneous design features that aren't necessary.

Re: Was This Website Designed By A 2-Year Old?
 

[ QUOTE ]
The site design is not bad, merely simple. It is conducive to reading the posts instead of having lots of extraneous design features that aren't necessary.

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: Was This Website Designed By A 2-Year Old?
 

There is very little design to this site, it's basically just UBB with funny colors and some ads.

Re: Was This Website Designed By A 2-Year Old?
 

[ QUOTE ]
The site design is not bad, merely simple. It is conducive to reading the posts instead of having lots of extraneous design features that aren't necessary.

[/ QUOTE ]

That seems to fit in with Mason's philosophy of running 2+2: All substance, no (or very little) style.

Re: Was This Website Designed By A 2-Year Old?
 

I don't expect updated graphics when I come here, and I don't expect to.

Re: Was This Website Designed By A 2-Year Old?
 

[ QUOTE ]
I don't expect updated graphics when I come here, and I don't expect to.

[/ QUOTE ]

You were a bit redundant in what you reduntantly said.

site design
 

[ QUOTE ]
All substance... no style.

[/ QUOTE ]
'Cept in OOT - no substance.

Form follows function and the site DOES work, no matter how it looks. And work well it does.
Even midget kangaroos post here, it's so darn popular.
However, the site could certainly use an over-haul. It's not only ugly, it's also too busy.

my vote: Back-end seems to work just fine. (except the archive).
Front end needs a new do.

Ot to the is

Re: Was This Website Designed By A 2-Year Old?
 

Crikey.